Calculate Flux in a closed Triangle

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating electric flux through different surfaces of a closed triangular box in a horizontal electric field of 7.80 x 10^4 N/C. For the vertical rectangular surface, the initial calculation yields a positive flux, but it should be negative due to the surface normal direction opposing the electric field. The slanted surface's area calculation requires adjusting for the angle, leading to a different flux value than initially assumed. The total flux through the entire surface is inferred to be zero, as the contributions from the vertical and slanted surfaces cancel each other out. Clarifications on the calculations and the reasoning behind the signs of the flux are requested for better understanding.
RedPhoenix
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider a closed triangular box resting within a horizontal electric field of magnitude E = 7.80 & 104 N/C as shown in Figure P24.4. Calculate the electric flux through (a) the vertical rectangular surface, (b) the slanted surface, and (c) the entire surface of the box.

phy1.jpg


Homework Equations



Flux = EAcos( )

The Attempt at a Solution



for a) I did

(7.8E4)(.1x.3)cos(0) = 2.34kN

The answer should be negative, why?
Would it be cos(180) instead? What is the reason for this?

for b), the slanted plane, the answer is 2.34kN, but why would it be? I did (7.8E4)(.1x.3)cos(0), which gives the right answer, but why is it 0? not 60 or something?

c) I am assuming because a and b cancel each other when added together.


A little input would be nice, thanks :)

Matt
 
Physics news on Phys.org
a) The surface normal and the electric field point in opposite directions.

b) The area of the slanted surface is not 0.1 \times 0.3 but \frac{0.1}{\cos 60} \times 0.3

\Phi_E=(7.8\times 10^4) \times \frac{0.1}{\cos 60} \times 0.3 \times \cos 60=(7.8\times 10^4) \times \0.1\times 0.3
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top