Calculate h if the fluid in the manometer is mercury

xCuzIcanx
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A venture flow-meter can be designed as
shown in the figure. At position 1 the
velocity is 0.5 m/s, and pressure is 1.3 bar.
The cross section area at 1 is two times the
area at 2. The fluid inside the manometer
has a density ρ, and the fluid column has a
high h as shown in the figure.
Assume the temperature is 20oC,
conducting the following analysis:
1) Derive the equation h as a function
of ρ.
2) Calculate h if the fluid in the
manometer is mercury

Picture is attached.

To be honest, I have no idea what I'm suppose to do. Please help.
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org


It's actually a 'venturi' flow meter.

Hint: apply Bernoulli's theorem to the flow.
 


SteamKing said:
It's actually a 'venturi' flow meter.

Hint: apply Bernoulli's theorem to the flow.

So the flow meter would have the equation of the Bernoulli's Equation for fluids and the manometer would have the equation deltaP=rho*g*h. But how would I find the equation with those two separate one?
 
Last edited:


xCuzIcanx said:
So the flow meter would have the equation of the Bernoulli's Equation for fluids and the manometer would have the equation deltaP=rho*g*h. But how would I find the equation with those two separate one?
You need to use the Bernoulli equation to calculate the pressure difference between the two points in the flow. Then you need to use the hydrostatic equation to determine the difference in height in the manometer for the calculated pressure difference.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top