Calculate N Slit Diffraction: Grating Width 5cm, Slit 0.0001cm, λ 5.5 x 10-5cm

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sharlom
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Diffraction Slit
AI Thread Summary
To determine the observable diffraction orders for a grating with a width of 5 cm and slits of width 0.0001 cm, the formula dsinθ=mλ is used, where d is the distance between slits, λ is the wavelength, and m is the order of diffraction. Setting θ to 90 degrees simplifies calculations, as it represents the maximum angle for observable diffraction, allowing for the calculation of the maximum possible order m. The resulting m value should be rounded down to the nearest whole number since only integer orders are physically observable. If m results in a decimal, such as 19.38, it indicates that 19 orders are visible, as values like 19.6 or 19.8 would still round down to 19. Understanding why θ is set to 90 degrees clarifies that angles beyond this point would not correspond to physically observable light paths.
Sharlom
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
This thread lacks the homework template because it was originally posted in a non-homework forum.
if I'm given grating width=5cm ,slits of width=0.0001cm separated by a distance of 0.0002cm
how many order would be observable at λ=5.5 x 10-5cm?
calculate the width of principle maximum?

please tell me the approach to do this problem
 
Physics news on Phys.org
to find observable orders,
In the websites it said use the formula dsinθ=mλ
then keep θ=90 and find m.
but why θ is put 90 degrees I'm not able understand?
 
here is one more similar question..please clear these doubts.
How many orders will be visible if the wavelength of the incident light is 5000 Å and the number of lines on the grating is 2620 per inch?
Ans: First of all I will find distance between each slit
d=1/2620 inch=2.54/2620 cm=9.69 x 10-4cm
keep θ=90 and find m (this i did to find the number of visible orders)
substituting values,
using the formula dsinθ=mλ
(9.69 x 10-4 cm)sin90=m(5000 x 10-8 cm)
I got m=19.38
# here it is coming to be a decimal number,the thing I know is that m should not come in decmals so i have a doubt that is my answer correct?
#let's say i round off 19.38 to 19 then it seems that 19 orders are visible, but imagine if m=19.6 or 19.8 etc. if this i round it off to 20,will my answer be right?
or still 19 orders are only visible ,since 0.6 or 0.8 are not an integer?
 
Sharlom said:
here is one more similar question..please clear these doubts.
How many orders will be visible if the wavelength of the incident light is 5000 Å and the number of lines on the grating is 2620 per inch?
Ans: First of all I will find distance between each slit
d=1/2620 inch=2.54/2620 cm=9.69 x 10-4cm
keep θ=90 and find m (this i did to find the number of visible orders)
substituting values,
using the formula dsinθ=mλ
(9.69 x 10-4 cm)sin90=m(5000 x 10-8 cm)
I got m=19.38
# here it is coming to be a decimal number,the thing I know is that m should not come in decmals so i have a doubt that is my answer correct?
#let's say i round off 19.38 to 19 then it seems that 19 orders are visible, but imagine if m=19.6 or 19.8 etc. if this i round it off to 20,will my answer be right?
or still 19 orders are only visible ,since 0.6 or 0.8 are not an integer?
even if m comes to be 19.8 or 19.6 or 19.9 etc. it should be taken as m=19 only.thus 19 orders will be visible.
 
Sharlom said:
but why θ is put 90 degrees I'm not able understand?

Imagine that you are standing right next to the slits. 0° means you are looking directly away from the slits, perpendicular to the screen that the slits are cut into. If you now turn through an angle greater than 90°, where are you looking? Can the light diffracted through the slits actually travel in that direction? (in the diagram below, the light travels from left to right)

Snapshot.jpg
 
Thank you..
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top