Calculate Width of River Given Boat V, Time, Angle | Whered I Go Wrong?

  • Thread starter Thread starter egg man
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The river flows at 5.84 km/hr, and a boat aims to cross perpendicularly at a 30-degree angle, taking 15.3 minutes to reach the opposite shore. The correct approach involves breaking down the boat's velocity into components, where the effective speed across the river is calculated using the cosine of the angle. The distance traveled by the boat is determined by multiplying its speed in km/min by the time taken. Using trigonometry, the width of the river can be found by applying the tangent function with the boat's distance and the river's speed. The calculated width of the river is approximately 89.1 km.
egg man
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
a river flows at a speed Vr=5.84 km/hr with respect to shore. a boat needs to go perpendicular to the shoreline to reach a pier across the river. the boat heads upstream at an angle of 30 degrees. if the time taken for the boat to cross is 15.3 min, what is the width of the river?

okay, i know the actual velocity of the boat over the velocity of the river(5.84) equals 1/sin30. so the velocity of the boat equals 11.68 km/hr. i divide by 60 and i get .195km/min. i multiply by 15.3 and get 2.98km. but that's not right. Pleeaaaase help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What I would do is break the vector velocities into "components". If the boat is aimed at 30 degrees (to the perpendicular) with speed Vr, then the x and y components of the velocityh vector are Vr cos(30) and Vr sin(30) respectively.
At that speed, the distance he goes (across the river- ignore the up or downstream motion) is Vr cos(30)*t= (5.84)(cos(30))(15.3).

Notice that the speed of the river doesn't come into this! That would, of course, affect what angle we have to aim upstream but we are, apparently, told that this was 30 degrees.
 


First of all, great job on calculating the velocity of the boat! That is an important step in solving this problem. However, it seems like you may have made a small mistake in your final calculation. Let's break down the steps to find the width of the river:

1. Convert the boat's velocity from km/hr to km/min: Since we are given the time in minutes, it would be easier to have the boat's velocity in km/min. So, we divide 11.68 km/hr by 60 to get 0.195 km/min.

2. Use the time and boat's velocity to find the distance traveled by the boat: We know that the boat traveled for 15.3 minutes at a velocity of 0.195 km/min. So, we can multiply these two numbers to get the distance traveled by the boat, which is 2.98 km.

3. Use trigonometry to find the width of the river: Now, we can use the distance traveled by the boat, the velocity of the river, and the angle of 30 degrees to set up a right triangle. The distance traveled by the boat is the adjacent side, the velocity of the river is the opposite side, and the width of the river is the hypotenuse. So, we can use the formula tan(theta) = opposite/adjacent to find the width of the river.

tan(30 degrees) = 5.84 km/hr / 0.195 km/min

tan(30 degrees) = 29.9

width of the river = opposite side = 29.9 * 2.98 km = 89.1 km

So, the width of the river is approximately 89.1 km. I hope this helps clarify where you went wrong in your calculation. Keep up the good work!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top