Calculating Acceleration of Mass in Atwood Machine

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion about calculating acceleration in an Atwood machine with masses m1 = 14.5 kg and m2 = 23.0 kg, participants explore the relevant equations and the reasoning behind their signs. The equations for each mass are derived from Newton's second law, with the tension in the string affecting the forces acting on each mass. Clarification is provided on why the equations appear reversed, with one mass experiencing tension as a negative force and the other as positive, depending on their respective directions of acceleration. Participants emphasize the importance of consistent sign conventions when setting up the equations. Ultimately, understanding these concepts is crucial for accurately solving problems involving Atwood machines.
jti3066
Messages
46
Reaction score
0
1.In the diagram above, the pulley is frictionless and the ropes are massless. Given that m1 = 14.5 kg and m2 = 23.0 kg, calculate the acceleration of m2 downwards. What is the magnitude of the tension in the string?
http://loncapa2.fsu.edu/enc/59/442f45016df264899bda870a0d495f3be185f0a9c3a069c0974d3402c80bd41f1205766cdaec4ada41f4efc2666f14750f4fc16641ffd2b0af613da7e393c18c701021fb78fb5ffbd3d77c79fd9b210f.gifI am not sure what the relevant equations would be.

N=mg?

3. The Attempt at a Solution

N1=(14.5)*(9.81)
N2=(23-14.5)*(a)

Set the equations equal and then solve for "a"?

I do know that this is an Atwood machine. I have searched this forum for examples and I am still unsure of how to solve this problem. TIA.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok i solved the problem thanks to some further research...

For mass1: Mg - T = ma

For mass2: T-mg = ma

Solved for T then put back into the equation for mass2...However, could someone give me the reasoning behind the order of the two equations i.e. Mg - T and T - Mg...TIA
 
"order of the two equations"?
I probably don't understand, but there is no special order - either one could be written first. They are just the "sum of forces = ma" for each of the two masses.

Can't see your diagram.
 
Sorry...why is the equation for mass1 Mg - T = ma...and why is the equation for mass2 written as T - Mg = ma...why are they "reversed"? Where one is -T while the other is +T...the same question could be asked for Mg...
 
Okay - sorry I'm a bit obtuse!
I'm guessing that the tension is up on one mass and down on the other so that's why the sign changes on the T. But it is odd to have a positive Mg as if gravity is up. I wish I could see the diagram.
 
It will take a few hours for that attachment to be approved.
If convenient, post it to a free photo site like photobucket.com and put a link here. If you put IMG in square brackets before the link and /IMG in square brackets after it, the pic will show up right in the post.
 
I found a picture of the Atwood machine and the equations you used here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atwood_machine
They are taking clockwise to be positive so they get mg positive on the one that is accelerating upward and mg negative on the one that is accelerating downward. You are free to choose whatever sign convention you want on each side, and it makes sense to keep all the forces and accelerations positive.

Maybe better to think of it this way:
Assume the acceleration is up on the left and down on the right and use "a" for both. Then you have -mg on the left because it opposes the ma. If the assumption is wrong, you'll end up with a negative value for a.
 
Back
Top