Calculating Acceleration on a Parabolic Curve

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the acceleration of a bead sliding along a parabolic wire described by the equation y=ax^2. Participants explore the concept of radius of curvature at the origin, which is essential for determining acceleration. The formula for radius of curvature is provided, emphasizing its relevance in the context of motion along a curve. The conversation highlights that acceleration can be derived from the second derivatives of displacement, with specific calculations leading to the conclusion that the acceleration in the x-direction is zero, while the y-direction acceleration is 2av_0^2. Ultimately, the key takeaway is that understanding the curvature and applying the correct mathematical principles are crucial for solving the problem.
dibilo
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
a smooth wire is shaped in the form of a parabola y=ax^2 on a horizontal plane. a bead slides along the wire. as it passes the origin, velocity is Vo. what is the acceleration.

..............
i see the parabola as part of a big circle and decided to use a=v^2/r and i know s=r(theta)... then i am lost... help! :cry:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Sounds like you need to know r, which is the radius of curvature of the parabola at the origin.

(...looks up radius of curvature...)

Here it is:

R=\frac{[1+\left(\frac{dy}{dx}\right)^2]^{3/2}}{\frac{d^2y}{dx^2}}
 
This is interesting. Would you show us how to derive this radius of curvature?
 
But just knowing the velocity at one point tells you nothing about the acceleration, on a curve or straight line. Is there more information?
 
HallsofIvy said:
But just knowing the velocity at one point tells you nothing about the acceleration, on a curve or straight line. Is there more information?

We can assume that the bead slides on the horizontal wire with constant speed. Otherwise the problem would be undetermined. The acceleration can be calculated without knowing about curvature, just from its definition: that it is the second derivative of the displacement, that is the componts of the acceleration are the second derivatives of the coordinates with respect to time. Choosing the plane of motion as the (x,y) plane, the components of the velocity are
v_x=\dot x,
v_y= \dot y = 2ax \dot x =2axv_x.

The components of the acceleration are the derivatives of those of the velocity,

a_x= \dot v_x,
a_y=\dot v_y=2a\dot xv_x+2ax\dot v_y = 2a\left({v_x}^2+x\dot v_x\right)

Moreover,

v_x^2+v_y^2=const \rightarrow v_x \dot v_x + v_y\dot v_y = 0

The acceleration is asked at the origin, x=0, y=0. Here

v_y=0\mbox{, so } v_x^2=v_0^2.

Because of v_y=0 at x=0, the acceleration in x direction is also 0: \dot v_x=0.

(The tangent of the curve at x=0 is the x axis, and the tangential acceleration is zero when the speed is constant)
The result is :

a_x=0.
a_y=2av_0^2, the nagnitude of the acceleration is

2av_0^2.

ehild
 
thx for all the replies ... today my teacher gave me another way of solving this prob.

s=r\theta=2x (whereby x is the 2 points \theta cuts at the x-axis)
a=v^2/r
y=ax^2
\theta/2= tan\theta/2= dy/dx= 2ax
therefore \theta=4ax
sub \theta=4ax into s=r\theta
r=1/(2a)
a=2av^2
 
Back
Top