Calculating air resistance homework

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating air resistance in a lab involving a bung swinging in a horizontal plane, akin to a conical pendulum. The user attempts to find air resistance by comparing theoretical and experimental kinetic energy, noting a widening gap as velocity increases. They express confusion over their results, which suggest that air resistance decreases with increasing radius, contradicting the expected relationship where air resistance should increase with velocity. Participants suggest that understanding the relationship between centripetal force and the weight hanging from the string is crucial for accurate calculations. The user seeks clarification on how to reconcile these findings and improve their calculations.
mindboggling
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I'm currently working on a lab which involves swinging a bung in the horizontal plane (just like a conical pendulum), however I'm a bit stumped at finding air resistance.

The variables we know are the radius, the centripetal force and the velocity of the bung.


The Attempt at a Solution



In attempt to calculate the wind resistance, i did the following:

W (non conservative) = delta KE +delta PE

Force (of air resistance) x distance = KE (theoretical) - KE (Experimental)

If i plotted KE theoretical and KE experimental on the y-axis and radius on the x, there is a gap inbetween both series, a gap that gets wider as velocity increases. This makes sense because velocity is proportional to force. And here i yield difference of 0.5 to 0.7.

HOWEVER, according to: Force (of air resistance) x distance = KE (theoretical) - KE (Experimental)

if i divide both sides by distance (2 pi radius: the conical pendulumn travles in a circle) and when i plot the force of air resistance over radius, air ressistance seems to go down as r increased! but this can't be the case because for some constant centripetal force, r is proportional to velocity SQUARED, and velocity is proportional to the force of air resistance.

So what did i do wrong??

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF mindboggling.

Do your calculations indicate that the centripetal force is too large (for the given speed and radius)?

How did you determine the magnitude of this force (weight hanging from the sting in the center)?
 
Last edited:
centripetal force is always constant. The independent variable would be the radius, because in this lab we are trying to see how radius affects the speed for a given centripetal force.

Yes, the magnitude of centripetal force is provided the weight hanging from the string in the center

Anyone?

Many thanks
 
What I meant is that if you had the mass (of the bung) you could calculate it (the centipetal force) and compare it with the hanging weight. How do these two forces compare?
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top