Calculating Average Force: Hockey Goalie Stops 59m/s Puck in 0.0021s

  • Thread starter Thread starter TheHamburgler1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the average force exerted by a puck on a hockey goalie when the puck, weighing 0.15 kg and traveling at 59 m/s, is caught in 0.0021 seconds. The calculated average force is 4214.029 N, which is confirmed as correct. Participants emphasize the importance of rounding to significant digits and providing a clear explanation of the calculation process for better assistance. The advice highlights that sharing the method used to arrive at an answer can facilitate quicker help. Overall, the conversation underscores the significance of clarity and precision in problem-solving.
TheHamburgler1
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
A hockey goalie m=85kg stands in front of the net. A player hits the 0.15kg puck towards the goalie with a velocity of +59m/s. The goalie catches the puck with his glove in a time of 0.0021seconds. (assume all collisions are linear)

A) what is the average force of the puck on the goalie?

I got the answer to be 4214.029N is this correct
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, that's correct. Two comments:
(1) Round off to a reasonable number of significant digits.
(2) To get the best help in the quickest time, never just give an answer, always show how you got the answer.
 
Alright sorry about that and thanks a lot I appreciate the advice
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'

Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'

Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is（Figure 2）： F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

What is the final velocity of the goalie after catching a hockey puck?
Replies
2
Views
4K
How Do You Calculate the Momentum of a Puck After a Collision?
Replies
5
Views
3K
Did I Calculate the Final Velocity and Direction of the Hockey Puck Correctly?
Replies
3
Views
4K
Newton's Laws -- Resting hockey puck hit with a force
Replies
8
Views
4K
How Far Does the Goalie Slide on Ice After Catching a Hockey Puck?
Replies
6
Views
2K
How Far Does a Goalie Slide After Catching a Puck?
Replies
11
Views
2K
Conservation of Angular momentum and linear momentum
Replies
7
Views
5K
Impulse that redirects a hockey puck 90°
Replies
4
Views
2K
Average Coefficient of Kinetic Friction between Ice and Puck
Replies
3
Views
4K
Calculate Kinetic Friction Coefficient for Hockey Puck on Ice
Replies
1
Views
4K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top