Calculating Capacitance: A Derivation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the capacitance of a parallel plate capacitor with a dielectric partially filling the gap between the plates. The user applies Gauss's law and derives the electric field inside and outside the dielectric, leading to an expression for the potential difference between the plates. There is confusion regarding the integration process and the factors involved, particularly the appearance of a factor of 2 in the equations. Participants suggest corrections to the user's equations, particularly regarding the displacement field D and the proper treatment of the dielectric. The conversation highlights the importance of accurately applying Gauss's law and integrating correctly to derive capacitance.
raggle
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A parallel plate capacitor consists of two plates, each of area A, separated by a small distance d. in this gap, a dielectric of relative permittivity εr and thickness d/2 is fitted tight against one of the plates, leaving an air gap of thickness d/2 between it and the other plate. Calculate the capacitance of the capacitor

Homework Equations



Gauss's law ∫D.dS = ρ

D = ε0(1+εr)E

C = Q/V

The Attempt at a Solution



First I said the plates have a charge density σ. By using Gauss's law in the dielectric I got D = σ, and then the second equation gives

E = D/ε0(1+εr) = σ/ε0(1+εr)

Then (this is where I'm worried I start going wrong) I use this to figure out the potential between the plates, and I split the integral up into two integrals, one inside the dielectric with E = σ/ε0(1+εr) and another outside the dielectric with E = σ/2ε0. Altogether this ends up giving:

V = -(\int_{0}^{d/2} \frac{\sigma dl}{2\epsilon_0 (1+\epsilon)} + \int_{d/2}^{d} \frac{\sigma dl}{2\epsilon_0})

and going through the integrals gives

V = \frac{(\epsilon - 1)d\sigma}{4\epsilon_0}

Finally, putting Q = Aσ, I ended up with

C = 4A \epsilon_0/(\epsilon -1)d

Could someone tell me if I made a mistake somewhere? I'm quite bad at calculating capacitance.
Also is it possible to do this problem by thinking of the capacitor as two capacitors connected in series? Because when I try the problem that way I end up getting a d in the numerator, so I think I've slipped up somewhere.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
raggle said:
D = ε0(1+εr)E

This should be D = ε0εrE


raggle said:
Then (this is where I'm worried I start going wrong) I use this to figure out the potential between the plates, and I split the integral up into two integrals, one inside the dielectric with E = σ/ε0(1+εr) and another outside the dielectric with E = σ/2ε0. Altogether this ends up giving:

Where are those 2's coming from?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top