Calculating Capacitance: A Derivation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the capacitance of a parallel plate capacitor with a dielectric partially filling the gap between the plates. The user applies Gauss's law and derives the electric field inside and outside the dielectric, leading to an expression for the potential difference between the plates. There is confusion regarding the integration process and the factors involved, particularly the appearance of a factor of 2 in the equations. Participants suggest corrections to the user's equations, particularly regarding the displacement field D and the proper treatment of the dielectric. The conversation highlights the importance of accurately applying Gauss's law and integrating correctly to derive capacitance.
raggle
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A parallel plate capacitor consists of two plates, each of area A, separated by a small distance d. in this gap, a dielectric of relative permittivity εr and thickness d/2 is fitted tight against one of the plates, leaving an air gap of thickness d/2 between it and the other plate. Calculate the capacitance of the capacitor

Homework Equations



Gauss's law ∫D.dS = ρ

D = ε0(1+εr)E

C = Q/V

The Attempt at a Solution



First I said the plates have a charge density σ. By using Gauss's law in the dielectric I got D = σ, and then the second equation gives

E = D/ε0(1+εr) = σ/ε0(1+εr)

Then (this is where I'm worried I start going wrong) I use this to figure out the potential between the plates, and I split the integral up into two integrals, one inside the dielectric with E = σ/ε0(1+εr) and another outside the dielectric with E = σ/2ε0. Altogether this ends up giving:

V = -(\int_{0}^{d/2} \frac{\sigma dl}{2\epsilon_0 (1+\epsilon)} + \int_{d/2}^{d} \frac{\sigma dl}{2\epsilon_0})

and going through the integrals gives

V = \frac{(\epsilon - 1)d\sigma}{4\epsilon_0}

Finally, putting Q = Aσ, I ended up with

C = 4A \epsilon_0/(\epsilon -1)d

Could someone tell me if I made a mistake somewhere? I'm quite bad at calculating capacitance.
Also is it possible to do this problem by thinking of the capacitor as two capacitors connected in series? Because when I try the problem that way I end up getting a d in the numerator, so I think I've slipped up somewhere.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
raggle said:
D = ε0(1+εr)E

This should be D = ε0εrE


raggle said:
Then (this is where I'm worried I start going wrong) I use this to figure out the potential between the plates, and I split the integral up into two integrals, one inside the dielectric with E = σ/ε0(1+εr) and another outside the dielectric with E = σ/2ε0. Altogether this ends up giving:

Where are those 2's coming from?
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top