Calculating Charge in an Earth Electric Field: Gauss' Law

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the charge in the Earth's electric field using Gauss' law, focus on the electric field strengths at the specified heights of 200 m and 300 m. The electric field strength decreases from 100 Vm⁻¹ to 60 Vm⁻¹, indicating a change in charge density. Apply Gauss' law, which relates the electric flux through a closed surface to the charge enclosed, to the cube with a side of 100 m positioned between these heights. It's essential to ignore the Earth's curvature for this calculation. Refer to an introductory physics textbook for detailed guidance on applying Gauss' law effectively.
carus88
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
The earth’s electric field is measured at a height of 200 m and is found to be directed vertically downwards and to have a strength of 100 Vm1. At a height of 300 m, the direction of the field is found to be the same, but the field’s strength has decreased to 60 Vm1. Use Gauss’ law to determine the amount of charge contained in a cube of side 100 m with one face parallel to the earth’s surface located at a height between 200 m and 300 m. (You may ignore the curvature of the earth.)

THIS IS FOR A PHYSICS DEGREE MODULE RESIT. I HAVE DRAWN RELEVANT DIAGRAMS YET I HAVE NO IDEA WHERE TO START. aNY GUIDANCE IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION WOULD BE A MASSIVE HELP.

do I use coulombs law and work out the respective charges?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
carus88 said:
... Use Gauss’ law ...

Use Gauss' law, not Coulomb's law.
 
This is a pretty standard and basic Gauss's Law problem. I would suggest finding an introductory physics textbook and reading the appropriate section. You might even find this same problem solved, or something like it.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top