Calculating Charge on a 1.72 g Gold Nugget

  • Thread starter Thread starter Purduenub03
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge Gold
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the net charge of a 1.72 g gold nugget after removing 1% of its electrons, first determine the total number of electrons in the nugget, which is approximately 4.154 x 10^23. Removing 1% of these electrons results in about 4.154 x 10^21 electrons being removed. Each electron has a charge of -1.602 x 10^-19 C, so the total charge removed is approximately -6.65 x 10^2 C. The nugget's net charge becomes positive due to the loss of negatively charged electrons, resulting in a net positive charge. The calculation confirms the importance of accurately determining the number of electrons and applying the charge of an electron to find the net charge.
Purduenub03
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
I'm sure I am missing something simple here but...

Suppose a 1.72 g nugget of pure gold has zero net charge. What would be its net charge after it has 1% of its electrons removed?

So i know that an electron is 9.109 x 10^-31 kg, and has a charge of -1.602 x 10^-19C. However, how do i know the split of electrons and protons in the gold bar?

I'd assume I am trying to get to mass of electrons / mass of electron, that times the charge of an electron divided by 100?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How many electrons in a Gold atom ? How many atoms in 1.72 g ?
 
79 electrons in a gold atom

1.72/196.96654 = .008732 atoms

so .008732 * .79 * 1.602 x 10 ^-19 ?
 
Okay,you're on the wrong track...

197g gold----------------------------->6.023 10^{23} atoms

1.72g gold----------------------------> x atoms

1 atom gold---------------------------> 79 electrons
x atoms gold---------------------------> y electrons


What do you get for "y"??

Daniel.
 
(1.71 / 197) * 6.023 X 10 ^23 * 79 = 4.154 x 10 ^ 23

AH!

and that divided by 100 x the charge is the answer

thank you

Ryan
 
Last edited:
Not so fast !

You've only found the number of electrons removed. Multiply this number by the charge on an electron to get the net positive charge.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top