Calculating Closest Approach of Colliding Protons

  • Thread starter Thread starter greggle
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Protons
greggle
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi Guys,

I was just wondering if you could help me, I seem to be having some problems getting to the correct answer (possibly because of my calculations). If two protons collide head on, both with energy 2keV... show that the closest approach is 7.2 x 10exp-11 cm. Now I know that when the protons are at closest approach then only the potential energy will be considered. Therefore V = q1q2 / r, which for a proton I know is e^2 / r, but for some reason I just cannot get to the right answer and I don't know if it is the way I am using electronvolts and joules. Please help.

Thanks
Greg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If one is using cgs units, then make sure all units are consistent, e.g. energy = ergs, displacement/distance = cm, charge = esu's.
 
Hi, I'm working in joules and eV...I still can't get it to the right answer... one question - to change from eV to joules it is simply multiplication of eV and 1.6 x 10exp-19? I haven't used eV for a very long time and can't quite remember how to do it.

Thanks for your help,

Greg
 
If you use eV for the energy, then you should onlly use one factor of e in the potential energy. That is U=ke/r is the PE for two protons in the unit eV.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top