Calculating Decay Lifetime of Unstable Isotope

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the decay lifetime of an unstable isotope using the average energy and line-width of emitted gamma rays. The average energy is given as 100 keV with a line-width of 5 x 10^-6 eV, prompting questions about how this relates to the isotope's lifetime. The connection to the Doppler shift effect and the Heisenberg uncertainty principle is explored, particularly the time-energy relationship. The uncertainty principle suggests that energy and time cannot be precisely measured simultaneously, which may provide insight into the decay process. Overall, the relationship between the gamma ray energy characteristics and the isotope's decay lifetime remains unclear to the participants.
square_imp
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
My question relates to calculating the decay lifetime of an unstable isotope. The information given is the average energy of the emitted gamma ray from the decay has an average energy of say 100kev and a line-width of 5 x 10^-6ev. From this information I need to work out the average lifetime for the isotope.

From what I can gather the problem seems to be similar to the Doppler shift effect. From the equation E = hf the energy of the gamma ray is related to its frequency and therefore the change in frequency can be worked out. Does the line width mean the upper and lower boundry of the gamma ray energy with the 100keV in the middle of that range? The other thing is that the shift of the energy either means the source is moving or the energy of the gamma rays emitted is changing for some other reason. The relation between this and the lifetime is not obvious to me. Any help would be much appreciated. I am probably missing something obvious.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
square_imp said:
My question relates to calculating the decay lifetime of an unstable isotope. The information given is the average energy of the emitted gamma ray from the decay has an average energy of say 100kev and a line-width of 5 x 10^-6ev. From this information I need to work out the average lifetime for the isotope.

From what I can gather the problem seems to be similar to the Doppler shift effect. From the equation E = hf the energy of the gamma ray is related to its frequency and therefore the change in frequency can be worked out. Does the line width mean the upper and lower boundry of the gamma ray energy with the 100keV in the middle of that range? The other thing is that the shift of the energy either means the source is moving or the energy of the gamma rays emitted is changing for some other reason. The relation between this and the lifetime is not obvious to me. Any help would be much appreciated. I am probably missing something obvious.

To *me*, this seems to be an application of the time-energy Heisenberg uncertainty principle. Have you covered that?
 
From what I recall we have covered parts of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, to note the position-momentum relationship. I will have a look and see what I can find about the time-energy relationship. I presume it will be similar to the position-momentum relationship.
 
From looking at the Heisenberg Principle again I find the relation as follows:

Energy uncertainty x Time uncertainty = Planks constant / 4 x pi

This is an equation describing that both the time and energy of a particle cannot be simultaneously accurately measured. The connection with my original problem I still cannot see really. :confused:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top