Calculating electric fields due to continuous charge distributions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field at the origin due to a linear semicircular rod with a linear charge density. A participant questions the formula used, noting that the denominator should include a² instead of just a, as this affects the units and correctness of the electric field calculation. The integral setup is confirmed to be correct for a semicircular distribution, with clarification on the limits of integration. The importance of unit consistency in physics problems is emphasized, and the participant expresses gratitude for the guidance received. Understanding the derivation of the components, such as the cosθ factor, is acknowledged as well.
al_famky
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
calculating electric fields due to continuous charge distributions?

a question I came across doing some electric field questions, and the answer was really confusing.

Homework Statement


Charge is distributed along a linear semicircular rod with a linear charge density λ as in picture attatched. Calculate the electric field at the origin

Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution


for the first question, the magnitude of E was calculated with dE=\frac{adθλ}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}a}, but why is there only one "a" in the denominator, not a^{2}? The final result was this equation \int^{\phi}_{-\phi}\frac{λcosθdθ}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}}=\frac{λsin\phi}{2\pi\epsilon_{0}} which makes sense only if the "a" was dropped.
Thanks to anyone who'd be willing to explain the answers!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Did you forget to attach the picture? Maybe I'm just stupid and don't know how to find it. I would want to make sure I understand the question correctly. The integral in your "attempt" goes from -\phi to +\phi. That makes me think that the rod is only a semicircle when \phi = \pi / 2. I'm guessing that's why it's called "semicircular" rather than "a semicircle". Is that correct?

Other than that, you're absolutely correct. It should be a^2 in the denominator of dE because otherwise the units are not even correct. As it is, the answer you've quoted has units of charge per unit length, which is the unit of electric potential, not electric field.

Finally, I'm assuming you understand where the factor of cos\theta in the integral comes from since you didn't ask about it specifically.
 
my apologies, I thought i did upload the picture.
But you got the gist of the problem from the without the picture anyways.
Unit check, the fundamental approach to going over problems---why didn't I think of that?
I do understand the cosθ, thanks for asking

Thank you for taking the time to reply!
 

Attachments

  • 捕获.PNG
    捕获.PNG
    3.2 KB · Views: 552
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top