Calculating Electric Potential for a Non-Negligible Thickness Toroid

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electric potential of a toroid with a non-negligible thickness. There is confusion regarding the linear charge density, specifically why it is expressed as λ = q/(2πR) despite the toroid's width of 2a. Participants highlight that the toroid's larger area implies a potentially lower linear charge density. The challenge of determining the charge distribution for a metallic toroid is acknowledged as a significant complexity in the calculations. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the need for a revised approach to account for the toroid's thickness in electric potential calculations.
member 731016
Homework Statement
Please see below
Relevant Equations
Please see below
For A.1 of this problem,
1675405830601.png

The solution is
1675399497646.png

However, I have a doubt about the linear charge density ##\lambda##.

I don't understand how ##\lambda = \frac {q}{2\pi R} ## since this is not a thin ring, but has a non-negligible width of ##2a##

I think that the toroid has a larger area than thin circle with a circumference ##2\pi R## so linear charge density should be less than that expression.

EDIT: How would we calculate the electric potential if the thickness was not neglected?

Many thanks !

Problem from:
https://www.ipho2021.lt/uplfiles/Th2.pdf
https://www.ipho2021.lt/uplfiles/Th2-Solution.pdf
 

Attachments

  • 1675399479240.png
    1675399479240.png
    36.3 KB · Views: 114
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
1675414550671.png
 
  • Like
Likes member 731016
BvU said:
Thank you for your reply @BvU!

However, how would we calculate the electric potential if the thickness was not neglected?

Many thanks!
 
Callumnc1 said:
Thank you for your reply @BvU!

However, how would we calculate the electric potential if the thickness was not neglected?

Many thanks!
Since it is metallic, your first challenge would be to figure out the charge distribution. Good luck with that.
 
  • Like
Likes member 731016, nasu and BvU
haruspex said:
Since it is metallic, your first challenge would be to figure out the charge distribution. Good luck with that.
Thank you for your reply @haruspex! Yeah that seems hard!
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
64
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K