Calculating Final Pressure in a Sublimation and Pressure Homework Problem

AI Thread Summary
The problem involves heating fluorine gas and solid iodine to produce iodine heptafluoride, requiring the calculation of final pressure in a 2.50 L container. Initial conditions include 350 torr of fluorine and 2.50 g of iodine at 250 K, with the reaction proceeding to 550 K. The limiting reagent is iodine, leading to the formation of 0.0197 moles of product. The final pressure is calculated using Dalton's Law of Partial Pressures, accounting for remaining fluorine and the product's pressure. The correct approach involves recalculating pressures at the final temperature, ultimately leading to a total pressure of approximately 0.534 atm.
Qube
Gold Member
Messages
461
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



When fluorine and solid iodine are heated at 550. K, the iodine completely sublimes and gaseous iodine heptafluoride forms. If 350. torr of fluorine gas and 2.50 g of solid iodine are put into a 2.50 L container at 250. K and the container is heated to 550. K, what is the final pressure in the flask?

Homework Equations



5F2 (g) + I2 (s) --> 2IF5(g)

The Attempt at a Solution



We have 350/760 atm of fluorine gas. Using the ideal gas law, P = nRT/V, we find taht we have 0.056 moles of F.

We also have 0.009 moles of solid iodine (2.5 grams / twice the molecular mass of elemental iodine).

This yields 0.0197 moles of product. Iodine is limiting and fluorine is in excess. The final pressure, by Dalton's Law of Partial Pressures, is the pressure of the product and the pressure of the remaining reactants.

We have 0.0197 * (5/2) moles of fluorine used. This means we have 0.056 minus 0.0475 moles of fluorine remaining. This means there are 0.085 moles of fluorine remaining. The pressure of this remaining fluorine is:

P = nRT/V = 0.085(0.0821)(550)/2.5 = 0.15 atm.

The pressure of the product is also nRT/V = 0.0197 * 0.0821 * 550 / 2.5 = 0.355 atm.

Summing these two pressures, we get 0.50 atm of pressure. However, this isn't an answer choice. The closest choice is 0.534 atm, leading me to believe there is an error in my calculations, and not a rounding one at that. Is there any flaw in my line of reasoning?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the formula of the iodine heptafluoride?
 
Oh snap. Hept ... that's prefix for 7. I confused that with pentafluoride. Thanks for the catch!
 
Okay, new balanced equation:

7F2 + I2 --> 2IF7.

New process.

We have to convert everything to atmospheres of pressure at 550 K to solve this problem. This is the most convenient way. My method doesn't work because it doesn't account for the temperature change and how that might affect the Fluorine in terms of pressure. I can't use pressure of F at the initial temperature and arrive at an amount of Fluorine; it'll change when the temperature changes.

1) Find the atmospheres of I2 at 550 K. P = nRT/V. P = 0.177 atm.

2) Find the atmospheres of F2 at 550 K. P / T = P / T. Convert torr to atm (350/760) and temperatures are in Kelvins (250 and 550 K). Solve for the new pressure of F2.

3) Now we can set up this classic problem (classic for my teacher; he often gives us atmospheres of pressure and has us to a stoichiometry problem; this just takes it a step further by withholding the proper pressure at the proper temperature). Use atmospheres of pressure for each reactant and find which one will result in the least amount (pressure) of product. Total pressure = pressure of product + pressure of left over reactants.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top