Calculating Final Speeds of Colliding Pucks on an Air-Hockey Table

  • Thread starter Thread starter davidphysics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Collision
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the final speeds of two colliding pucks on an air-hockey table using conservation of momentum. Puck A, with a mass of 0.028 kg and an initial velocity of +5.5 m/s, collides with stationary puck B, which has a mass of 0.068 kg. Participants emphasize the importance of assuming the collision is elastic and using momentum formulas, while also addressing the need to resolve velocity into horizontal and vertical components. The initial momentum is entirely along the x-axis, leading to the conclusion that the y-components of momentum after the collision must equal zero. Ultimately, the original poster realizes their errors in setting up the equations and successfully finds the solution.
davidphysics
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Hey. This is my first post... here's my question [Diagram Attached]:

The drawing shows a collision between two pucks on an air-hockey table. Puck A has a mass of 0.028 kg and is moving along the x-axis with a velocity of +5.5 m/s. It makes a collision with puck B, which has a mass of 0.068 kg and is initially at rest. After the collision, the two pucks fly apart with the angles shown in the drawing.

Find the final speed of
(a) puck A and

(b) puck B. [both in m/s]

I am having trouble with this and although I know to use conservation of momentum, should I assume its elastic?

If you could post an explanation that would be great, but I would also like a final answer in numbers please.
 

Attachments

  • 07_32.gif
    07_32.gif
    11.8 KB · Views: 623
Physics news on Phys.org
davidphysics said:
If you could post an explanation that would be great, but I would also like a final answer in numbers please.

No one is interested in doing your homework for you, but rather in helping you understand. So don't be too disappointed with only an explanation.

Have you tried using momentum formulas and a little trig? Put in a little effort so people can see where you're having trouble.
 
tony873004 said:
No one is interested in doing your homework for you, but rather in helping you understand. So don't be too disappointed with only an explanation.

Have you tried using momentum formulas and a little trig? Put in a little effort so people can see where you're having trouble.

Ok sorry let me explain what I've gotten to... Basically I've set up both horizontal and vertical equations for both Po=Pf and Ko=Kf. Before I go any further, am I correct to assume that it is elastic and that the kinetic energy is conserved?

To be honest I don't wan't to use up my 4 trys on webassign, which I'm sure your familiar with.

By the way, thanks for the quick response.
 
And when I plug in the values for "v" in those formulas I should use for example Vacos65 and Vasin65 for the horiz and vert respectively, right?

For some reason I keep getting the Vert for a and b=0, because both the initial momentum and kin energy=0. So when I solve I get Vert: Va=Vb=0... I feel like I'm doing something very stupid.
 
Yes, I'm familiar with the 4 attempts :)

Unless energy is being carried away in sound waves or by other means, I would guess your assumption is correct. Your picture isn't approved yet, so I can't be sure.
 
tony873004 said:
Your picture isn't approved yet, so I can't be sure.

O didn't realize that, please read my post that I just posted a second ago, and I'll put the image on imageshack.

POSTED:http://img135.imageshack.us/img135/9303/0732jj6.gif

And when I plug in the values for "v" in those formulas I should use for example Vacos65 and Vasin65 for the horiz and vert respectively, right?

For some reason I keep getting the Vert for a and b=0, because both the initial momentum and kin energy=0. So when I solve I get Vert: Va=Vb=0... I feel like I'm doing something very stupid.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Bump (sorry)
 
Keep in mind your total momentum before the collision was completely on the x-axis. There was no momentum on the y-axis. So afterwards, the y-components of the momentums of your two objects should also equal zero since it is conserved.

I'm on my way out the door, so I can't help you further. But others are sure to jump in. Good luck, and welcome to the forum.
 
tony873004 said:
Keep in mind your total momentum before the collision was completely on the x-axis. There was no momentum on the y-axis. So afterwards, the y-components of the momentums of your two objects should also equal zero since it is conserved.

I'm on my way out the door, so I can't help you further. But others are sure to jump in. Good luck, and welcome to the forum.

Wow, then that image is very deceiving... thanks for your help -Everyone else JUMP IN! :)

Just thinking of it that makes perfect sense, now I see how these pictures mess with your mind.

Disregard everything above, yea so the Vert momentum up = vert momentum down
 
  • #10
For some reason I keep getting the Vert for a and b=0, because both the initial momentum and kin energy=0. So when I solve I get Vert: Va=Vb=0...
But the initial momentum is not zero. It is in the vertical direction, but not in the horizontal. The initial kinetic energy is not zero either, since A is moving.
 
  • #11
hage567 said:
But the initial momentum is not zero. It is in the vertical direction, but not in the horizontal. The initial kinetic energy is not zero either, since A is moving.

I mean the initial VERT momentum. But thanks for "The initial kinetic energy is not zero either, since A is moving." Can't believe I screwed that up. I don't have any more time now, but I'll work on that tomorrow and will come back to this forum later.

Thanks! and cya
 
  • #12
You need to apply conservation of momentum and energy. Initial conditions do not require you to resolve the velocity vector into components. You need to resolve the velocity vector into x and y components for the final condition.
 
  • #13
Hi. I am still having trouble and would like help. Its not working out.

Thanks
 
  • #14
Show how you set up your equations. We can't find what you're doing wrong if you don't show us your work.
 
  • #15
Nevermind - I figured it out. I was making it much too difficult. All I had to do was Po=Pf for the horiz and vert, and solve that set of equations.
 
Back
Top