Calculating Force of Friction: Newton's Law Applied in a Physics Experiment

  • Thread starter Thread starter oooo
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
In a physics experiment, students calculate the force of friction exerted by a table to stop a paper cone, finding it to be 2.2 Newtons when the cone starts at 18 cm. A question arises about the force of friction when the cone starts from a height of 72 cm, with one student proposing a proportional calculation that results in 8.8 N. Despite using both proportional reasoning and energy calculations, the student's answer was marked incorrect, prompting a request for clarification on the mistake. The discussion highlights that the force of friction is ideally independent of speed and remains constant if the cone's weight and the table's flatness are unchanged. Understanding the setup and the relationship between the cone and the ball is crucial for accurate calculations.
oooo
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
SIMPLE math-- Didn't I do this right?

In a physics experiment, students calculate the force of friction that a table exerts to stop a paper cone. When the ball starts at a height of 18 cm, the force of friction is 2.2 Newtons. What will be the force of friction if the ball starts from a height of 72 cm?

Wouldn't you set up a proportion and solve for x which is the force in Newtons? I did and got 8.8 N. Isn't that correct? For some reason, my homework is marked wrong and if I made a mistake, I want to know what it was.

(I also tried solving for their energies so that I could get work = the change in total energy so I could find the force using the work formula. I came up with 8.8 N with this approach also)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I cannot picture this set-up. Where did the ball come from and how does it relate to the paper cone? How far did the cone travel?

Anyway, the force of friction is (ideally) independant of speed; if the cone remains a constant weight, and the table remains flat, then the force of friction will be the same no matter what happens.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top