Calculating Jupiter's Mass from Log10(a) vs Log10(P) Graph

  • Thread starter Thread starter bemc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graph Mass
bemc
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
my problem involves creating a graph of log10(a) vs log10(P) of the Galilean satellites and 3 others, then calculate the mass of Jupiter from the graph. P= period of the satelite, a is the semi-major axis

I have created the graph and it seems to be right since the of the trend line is 3/2. My problem is that I am unsure how to go about calculating the mass from the graph.

to get the equation y = 1.5012x - 8.1973

I have tried using m1+m2= (4*P^2*a^3)/(G*P^2)G being the universal gravitational constant 6.67206 x 10-11 m3/kg s2. I used P and A values of Io. Unfortunatly that produced a rather large value and doesn't utilize the graph at all.

Any help or nudges in the right direction would be greatly appreciated, Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org


You can neglect the masses of the satellites I think, since Jupiter is so much more massive than its satellites. Remember that the gradient is just effectivelylog_{10}(a) / log_{10}(p).
Start by rearranging the kepler equation so you can the gradient part on one side, then take the log remembering log_b(x^y) = ylog_b(x)

,
 


bemc said:
I have tried using m1+m2= (4*P^2*a^3)/(G*P^2)

You have miscopied the equation. That is not the Kepler law equation. You should have written
m1+m2= (4*PI^2*a^3)/(G*P^2)

where PI stands for the number 3.14...
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?

Similar threads

Back
Top