Calculating Jupiter's Mass from Log10(a) vs Log10(P) Graph

  • Thread starter Thread starter bemc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graph Mass
bemc
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
my problem involves creating a graph of log10(a) vs log10(P) of the Galilean satellites and 3 others, then calculate the mass of Jupiter from the graph. P= period of the satelite, a is the semi-major axis

I have created the graph and it seems to be right since the of the trend line is 3/2. My problem is that I am unsure how to go about calculating the mass from the graph.

to get the equation y = 1.5012x - 8.1973

I have tried using m1+m2= (4*P^2*a^3)/(G*P^2)G being the universal gravitational constant 6.67206 x 10-11 m3/kg s2. I used P and A values of Io. Unfortunatly that produced a rather large value and doesn't utilize the graph at all.

Any help or nudges in the right direction would be greatly appreciated, Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org


You can neglect the masses of the satellites I think, since Jupiter is so much more massive than its satellites. Remember that the gradient is just effectivelylog_{10}(a) / log_{10}(p).
Start by rearranging the kepler equation so you can the gradient part on one side, then take the log remembering log_b(x^y) = ylog_b(x)

,
 


bemc said:
I have tried using m1+m2= (4*P^2*a^3)/(G*P^2)

You have miscopied the equation. That is not the Kepler law equation. You should have written
m1+m2= (4*PI^2*a^3)/(G*P^2)

where PI stands for the number 3.14...
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top