Calculating Kinetic Energy of an Alpha Particle

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the kinetic energy of an alpha particle, where the initial attempt incorrectly used the rest mass energy formula E = mc^2. The user calculated the rest energy of the alpha particle as 3.615 x 10^17 eV, which equates to 0.0579 joules, but this does not represent kinetic energy. Participants clarified that the total energy includes both rest mass energy and kinetic energy, emphasizing the need to calculate the kinetic energy separately. The user ultimately understood the distinction and the correct approach to the problem.
astri_lfc
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement

attachment.php?attachmentid=65090&stc=1&d=1387977546.jpg

could you help me for the question b?

Homework Equations


E = mc^2

The Attempt at a Solution



the mass of the alpha particle is 0.66466 x 10^-26 kg >> 4.022 u

put it into the equation, so
E = 4.022 x c x c = 3.615 x 10^17 eV >> 0.0579 joule

my answer is that, but my teacher answer is 1.89x10^-13 joule..

which one is true? can you show me where's my wrong?
 

Attachments

  • SAM_2832.JPG
    SAM_2832.JPG
    40.6 KB · Views: 1,291
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Merry Xmas.

What you're calculating is the energy due to the (rest) mass of the alpha particle. That's not kinetic energy.

The alpha particle's total energy comprises energy due to its (rest) mass plus its kinetic energy. You need to determine the latter.

You can just work with mass, because mass and energy are basically equivalent (or proportional, depending on choice of units). Calculate the total mass of on the left hand side. Calculate the total mass on the right hand side. You may ignore the photon because at the minimum KE of the alpha particle, the photon will have no energy. Can you now figure out the "extra" mass on the LHS? Convert that to energy.
 
merry christmas too ;)

thankyou :D i understand it now!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top