Calculating Kinetic Energy Using the Work-Energy Theorem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the kinetic energy of a charged particle using the work-energy theorem. The user inquires whether they can apply the theorem, and it is confirmed that they can, as the initial kinetic energy (Ki) is zero when the particle is released from rest. The potential energy (Ui) at 8.00 m needs to be calculated, but the user initially misapplies the formula for potential energy, which should be U = VQ instead of Ui = Vi/Q. The correct approach involves finding the electric potential at 8 m based on the known potential at 1 m, utilizing the inverse relationship of potential with distance. Ultimately, the discussion emphasizes using ratios to simplify the calculations without needing to determine the charge directly.
evgeniy
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi there,

I am thinking about a problem here,

A particle q produces an electric potential of 6.30E2 V at a distance of 1 m away. If a particle of charge Q=0.00300 C is released from rest at a distance of 8.00 m from q, what will be its kinetic energy after moving very far from q?

My question is, can I use the work-energy theorem here? As in
Ki + Ui = Kf + Uf ?
If I choose a point at 8.00m, then the Ki will be zero, am I right? Then Ui would be Ui = Vi/Q, is this the right equation to use? And then at infinity or very far away, Uf will be zero too. Is this the right approach?

Need help...thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
evgeniy said:
My question is, can I use the work-energy theorem here? As in
Ki + Ui = Kf + Uf ?
That's conservation of energy: sure you can use it.
If I choose a point at 8.00m, then the Ki will be zero, am I right?
Right. It's released from rest at that point.
Then Ui would be Ui = Vi/Q, is this the right equation to use?
No. U = VQ. But how can you find the potential at 8 m? You are only given the potential at 1 m. (Hint: How does potential from a point charge depend on distance?)
And then at infinity or very far away, Uf will be zero too. Is this the right approach?
Yes.
 
I see what you are saying.
I kinda get it now. So I am supposed to find a potential at 8m. But...
using the equation V = U/qo = 1/4(pi)(epsilon-naught) * q/r...r is the distance from the point charge q to the point at which the potential is evaluated right? But I do not know the value of a charge of q. So I need to find a charge first since I know the potential at 1m. And after it, I will find the potential at 8m, since now I know the charge. And at the end I will use U = Vq. Am I correct?
 
Yes, you are correct. But don't waste any time calculating the charge. Use ratios! (You know that the potential is proportional to 1/r; that's all you need to know.)
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top