Calculating Lowest Frequency of EMR to Initiate Photocurrent

  • Thread starter Thread starter ussrasu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Frequency
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the lowest frequency of electromagnetic radiation (EMR) required to initiate a photocurrent when UV radiation at 250 nm liberates electrons with a maximum kinetic energy of 1.00*10^-19 J. The initial calculations presented are correct, leading to a final frequency of 1.05*10^15 Hz. However, there is a critique regarding the grouping of the work function (Ø) and kinetic energy (K) as total energy, emphasizing that Ø represents the negative change in energy for the electron. The conversation also touches on the conservation of energy principles related to this calculation. Overall, the calculations are validated, but the conceptual understanding of energy changes is questioned.
ussrasu
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
Can some please review this question and tell me if the working looks correct? Please advise of any mistakes i may have made. Thanks

Q: UV radiation (wavelength = 250 nm) falls on a metal target, and electrons are liberated. If the maximum kinetic energy of these electrons is 1.00*10^-19 J, what is the lowest frequency EMR that will initiate a photocurrent on this target?

A: E = Ø + K = h*(c/λ)

Therfore Ø = ((h*c)/250*10^-9) - 1*10^-19
Which = 6.96*10^-19 J
= h*f

Therefore f = 1.05*10^15 Hz

Is this what i am supposed to do? Thanks for any help! :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your final answer is correct.

I find it peculiar that you group " Ø + K " together
- it's NOT the total Energy " E " of any configuration!
Rather, it's the NEGATIVE Energy change of the electron
(- E_initial + E_final) ... so it does equal E_photon,initial.

Most of us learn conservation laws as
"final = initial + change" or "change = final - initial" ,
once in a while as "in - out = change".
Is there a word for this "negative change"?
 
This is what my demonstrator told me to use?
 
Do you see how it comes from E conservation?
Ø is just the negative of the electron's initial PE, etc.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...

Similar threads

Back
Top