Calculating maximum amount of water vapor per unit volume

guitarstorm
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Compute the maximum amount of water vapor per unit volume that air can hold at the surface, where Ts = 288 K, and at a height of 10 km where T = 220 K. Express your answers in kg m-3.

Homework Equations



e_{s}=Ae^{\beta T}

e=\rho _{v}R_{v}T

The Attempt at a Solution



Since saturation occurs when e=e_{s}, I figured I would set the two equations equal to each other. However, solving for \rho _{v} doesn't work... The units don't work out, and I get a really large number... I feel like I have to somehow relate this to the total pressure of the air, but I'm unsure how to go about this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I was incorrect in my previous post saying that the units didn't work out... Solving for {\rho _{v}} when e=e_{s} does produce an answer in \frac{kg}{m^{3}}... However I'm getting 1,103,248.397 \frac{kg}{m^{3}}, for the first case where T=288 K, which is way off from what I should be getting (0.0126 \frac{kg}{m^{3}}).

I believe I then have to use the ideal gas equation, pV=nRT, plugging in p for e... But this is where the confusion comes in. Hopefully someone can help me with this tonight, since this HW is due tomorrow morning...
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top