Calculating Mechanical Energy on a Water Slide

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the mechanical energy of a child sliding down a water slide, emphasizing the relationship between potential energy (PE) and kinetic energy (KE). At the top of the slide, the mechanical energy is derived from KE, but the initial calculation is incorrect due to misapplication of energy conservation principles. The correct approach requires evaluating mechanical energy at the same point, not mixing values from different heights. The height of the slide above the water level is also questioned, highlighting the importance of understanding energy conservation in this context. Overall, the mechanical energy remains constant unless non-conservative forces like friction are involved.
wolves5
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
A 50.8 kg child slides down a water slide with a velocity of 0.9 m/sec at the top. At the bottom of the slide, she is moving horizontally, y=2.5 meters above the water. She splashes into the water d=3 meters to the left of the bottom of the slide.

a) Assuming potential energy to be zero at the water level, what is the mechanical energy of the child at the top of the slide?

For this, ME=PE+KE. Since PE=0, ME=0+KE. So ME=0.5 (50.8) (0.9^2), but that's not right.

b) How high is the top of the slide above the bottom of the slide?
I don't know how to do this one.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mechanical energy is a conserved quantity. Unless things like friction are involved (non conservative forces) but the problem would state this outright.

Therefore the mechanical energy at the bottom of the slide is the same as the top.

You are using the KE at the top of the slide plus the PE at the bottom of the slide.. that is not right, you need to add the KE and PE at the same place to find the ME.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top