Calculating moments of forces/fulcrum PDF file attached

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating forces at a fulcrum in a non-equilibrium scenario, referencing a PDF for specific questions. Participants express uncertainty about how to determine the force at the fulcrum, questioning whether to sum forces or consider the fulcrum's position. There is a focus on applying Newton's Second Law and the moment of inertia in the calculations. Additionally, the presence of friction at the fulcrum and the effect of gravity on the bar are raised as important considerations. Clarification on these points is needed to accurately solve the problem presented.
mt05
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
1) see pdf
for question 2 I'm unsure how to calculate the force at the fulcrum since its not in equilibrium. I thought maybe i would add the two forces together, but that doesn't seem right.


2) so this question asks for what forces need to be applied at points A and B and i understand what forces need to be applied at A ( i think ). but at point B wouldn't the fulcrum have to have an equal amount of force pushing up...so 50+20 = 70N...doesn't seem right since the fulcrum isn't centered.

please see pdf attached, thanks in advance
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
For question 2
The statement of the problem is missing, so I assume that the mass of the bar is given. Call it m. You need to write two expressions for Newton's Second Law, ∑F = macm and ∑τ = Ifulcrumα. Here Ifulcrum is the moment of inertia of the bar about the fulcrum.

For question 3, is there friction at the fulcrum? If no, then it seems that you have put in the right forces. It is assumed that the fulcrum provides whatever force is necessary to keep the bar at equilibrium.*** On edit ***
Are we to assume that gravity acts on this bar?
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
923
Replies
8
Views
2K
Back
Top