Calculating Peak Electron Density and Altitude of Ionospheric Layer

  • Thread starter Thread starter stunner5000pt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Density Electrons
stunner5000pt
Messages
1,443
Reaction score
4
A planet with an atmosphere entirely consisting of O2 and atomic oxygen, O, is exposed to solar EUV radiation at a wavelength of λ = 80 nm. The O2 does not absorb this radiation but the atomic oxygen is ionized by it with an absorption and ionization cross section of σ = 1x10-18 cm2. The O+ ions rapidly undergo charge exchange with O2 to form O2+ ions, and the only electron and ion loss process is dissociative recombination of the O2+ ions
O2+ e→O+O k1 = 1x10-8 cm3 s-1
If the solar flux is 1x10^11 photons cm-2 s-1 at 80 nm, the atomic oxygen scale height is 50 km and the O density is 1.6x10^12 cm-3 at 100 km, calculate the peak electron density of the resulting ionospheric layer for a solar zenith angle of 0°. What is the altitude of the electron density maximum?

thing is we know the solar flux anbd the nergy of each photon thus we know the totla energy coming into the planet

is this the formula i have to be using
n_{e}(h,\chi) = \sqrt{\frac{q_{max}}{keff}} \exp[0.5{1-z-\sec \chi \exp(-z)}] where
z = \frac{h-h^0_{max}}{H_{O}}
where ne is the electron density at some height h and zenith angle chi

q max is the ion production rate
h is the height
h0 is the maximum height at where the maximum occurs
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You will need that equation, but it doesn't describe the electron density. Did you learn anything in class about detailed balance and/or equilibrium calculations?
 
we never actually did any calculations in class per se

but from term equilibrium i gather that it has something to do iwth hte amount of energy being deposited

q(h) = I_{t} \sigma n_{0} \exp\left(\frac{h}{H} - \sigma n_{0} H \sec(\chi) \exp(-\frac{h}{H}) \right)

from here we can geta ratio between qmax and hmax
not sure where to proceed from there

could we assume that hte max depsotion occurs at 200 km? From this we can say z (from the first post) is zero. We can also calculate qmax using this asumption.
Could we then differentiate this function wrt height h and get what we need?

n_{e}(h,\chi) = \sqrt{\frac{q_{max}}{keff}} \exp[0.5{1-z-\sec \chi \exp(-z)}]
?
 
Last edited:
stunner5000pt said:
but from term equilibrium i gather that it has something to do iwth hte amount of energy being deposited

It is related to this. What are the two processes being balanced? In other words, if one assumes that the rate at which electrons are released (ionized) is the same as being captured, what are the processes causing release and capture? Why would there be a balance in the first place?
 
wouldnt simly the forward reaction O2+ e→O+O k1 = 1x10-8 cm3 s-1 and the corresponding backward reaction be the balancing processes?
there would be balance because at these levls there is failry consatnt concentration of the constituents?
 
stunner5000pt said:
wouldnt simly the forward reaction O2+ e→O+O k1 = 1x10-8 cm3 s-1

This is indeed the reaction that removes electrons from the plasma.


and the corresponding backward reaction be the balancing processes?

No, how do you suppose the photons fit into this?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top