Calculating potential from a nonuniform linear charge distribution.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electric potential at point P1 due to a thin plastic rod with a nonuniform linear charge density defined as λ = cx. The user initially attempted to integrate the potential using the formula V = ∫(kcx)/(x+d) dx from 0 to L but found a discrepancy between their result of 156 Volts and the book's answer of 18.6 mV. Clarifications were made regarding the units of the charge density, with c being correctly identified as C/m^2. The user later confirmed that using a TI-84 Plus calculator yielded a result of approximately 0.01863 Volts, indicating a realization of an earlier miscalculation. The discussion highlights the importance of careful integration and unit consistency in electrostatics problems.
r0wbrt
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The thin plastic rod has length L, and a nonuniform linear charge density λ = cx. With V = 0 at infinity, find the electric potential (in V) at point P1 on the axis, at distance d from one end.
c = 28.9 pC/m^2
L = 12.0cm
d = 3.00 cm

Now, from what I can tell the left side of the rod is placed at the origin, and p1 is a distance of d from the left end.

Homework Equations



V = (kq)/r (potential of the point charge).

V = \int \frac{kcx}{x+d} dx.

k is the Coulomb constant.

The Attempt at a Solution



Now I assumed using the above equation to integrate the potential over 0 to L would give the solution. However, when I checked the back of the book I was mistaken. Is it possible I missed something? I am treating cx dx as an point charge and summing over the potential each one produces at the point in question.

I get using the equation 156Volts while the book claims the answer to be 18.6mV.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why is c C/m^2? It should be C/m.

Apart from this, I think your approach is correct. Without seeing how you integrated the thing, I can't say more.
 
Okay, yes disregard my question. I was using a computer algebra system (Microsoft Mathematics) to solve the integral. I tried it on my TI-84 Plus and I got .01863 Volts.

(This is what I get for being lazy).
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top