Calculating Pull Force on Weights Connected by Cords

  • Thread starter Thread starter Motorboar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the pull force on a series of weights connected by cords, given an upward acceleration of 4.00 m/s². The weights have masses of 5 kg, 10 kg, 15 kg, and 20 kg, and the pull force P is being questioned. The initial calculation using F = ma resulted in a pull force of 552 N, which does not match the provided answer options. Participants suggest that the logic in the equations is correct, but there may have been an error in the mass calculations. The user ultimately realizes they miscalculated the total mass.
Motorboar
Messages
6
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A series of weights connected by very light cords are given an upward acceleration of 4.00 m/s2 by a pull P, as shown in Fig. 5.3.( a verticle strand of 4 balls with mass 5,10,15,and 20 kg with the pull at the top) A, B, and C are the tensions in the connecting cords.
the pull P is closest to:

290 N
690 N
50 N
200 N
490 N

Homework Equations


F= ma


The Attempt at a Solution


treating the weights as one mass
Pull-mg=ma
pull=m(a+g)
= 552
Which is not one of the answers. What is the error in my logic?
 
  • Like
Likes Bassim Kiani
Physics news on Phys.org
Motorboar said:

The Attempt at a Solution


treating the weights as one mass
Pull-mg=ma
pull=m(a+g)
= 552
Which is not one of the answers. What is the error in my logic?

I'm don't see an error in your logic (if I'm interpreting your description of the figure correctly). :approve: Maybe there's an error in your calculations? :rolleyes: What did you use for m and g?

[Edit: In other words, your equations seem fine. But I don't know why you ended up with 552]
 
added the masses wrong xD Thank you.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top