Calculating Required Torque for Rotating an Object at 1RPM in 1 Second

  • Thread starter Thread starter PC22
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Motor Torque
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the required torque to rotate an object from 0 to 1 RPM in 1 second, the torque formula used is Torque = Force x radius, with the radius being 0.005 meters. The object weighs 20 kg and is on a low friction bearing, leading to the calculation of force as mass times acceleration. The acceleration is derived from the final velocity of 0.0314 m/s divided by time, resulting in a torque equation of T = 0.186/t Nm. The discussion highlights the user's need for further guidance in engineering concepts, despite having followed online examples correctly.
PC22
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi I am trying to work out the torque required to rotate an object from 0 to 1RPM in 1 second (1 second accelerate to 1RMP) , its working in time laps so very small movement is required.

The diameter of the gear is 30mm and the diameter of the shaft is 10mm, the object on top weights 20kg it's sitting on a low friction bearing.

So far I have

Torque = F x r

r = radius of the cylinder = 0.005

Force = mass x acceleration
where mass = 20kg

accel = velocity/time

velocity = r x ω (rotational speed)

where ω at 1RPM = 6.28 rad/sec

So v = 0.005 x 6.28 = 0.0314 m/s

Therefore accel = 0.0314/t

Therefore T = 12 x 0.031/t x 0.005
= 0.186/t Nm

I know there is a lot more to this but I am very new to this and out of my comfort zone in terms of engineering knowledge (I'm a product designer) , I've mainly been following pre worked examples I've found online. Would really appreciate some help and guidance.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Seems like you got the correct answer, So what's the problem?
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top