Calculating SAR from multiple sources

  • Thread starter Thread starter Wotwot
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Multiple Sources
AI Thread Summary
The Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) is calculated using the formula SAR = (sigma * Erms^2) / p, where sigma is conductivity, Erms is the RMS electric field, and p is density. To calculate total SAR from multiple sources at the same frequency, the correct approach is to first calculate the total electric field at the location, then determine its RMS value for use in the SAR equation. This is necessary because the square of the sum of electric fields differs from the sum of their squares, leading to different SAR values. If the sources operate at different frequencies, the method remains the same, as electric fields can interfere constructively or destructively. Therefore, method one is confirmed as the accurate way to calculate total SAR in this scenario.
Wotwot
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
The Specific Absorption Rate (the rate at which energy is absorbed by a unit mass) given in W/kg is calculated by the following equation

SAR = (sigma * Erms^2) / p

Where sigma is the conductivity of the material (given in S/m), Erms is the RMS electric field (V/m) at the location and p is the density of the material (kg/m^3)

If there were multiple sources radiating the body from different places, all of them with the same frequency, and I wanted to calculate the total SAR at a specific location within the body, how would I go about doing that?
I have three options here.

1) Calculate the total electric field at the location and then calculate its RMS value and use it in the above equation

2) Calculate the SAR due to each source separately by using the Erms values due to each source and then add all the SAR values together

3) Add all the Erms values due to all the sources together and use this new Erms value in the above equation to find SAR

The above two methods give two different answers because of the fact that:

(a+b)^2 is not the same as (a^2 + b^2)

Does my choice of method change if all the sources have different frequencies?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
As electric field is a vector quantity, it can be either constructive or destructive at a particular point if radiated from two or more sources. So, the method 1) will give the right SAR amount.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top