Calculating Slit Width from Diffraction Pattern

  • Thread starter Thread starter Octoshark
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Diffraction
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the slit width from a diffraction pattern created by a He-Ne laser with a wavelength of 632.8 nm. The initial attempt used an incorrect distance for the first minima, leading to an erroneous slit width calculation of 6.577 x 10^-6 m. Clarification was provided that the "distance of minima" should refer to the distance from the center to the first minima, not an arbitrary value. After adjusting the distance to 0.076 m, the user still found the calculation to be incorrect, indicating a misunderstanding of the minima positioning. The thread emphasizes the importance of accurately identifying the distance to the correct minima for precise calculations.
Octoshark
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The diffraction pattern shown in the figure is produced by passing He-Ne laser light (λ = 632.8 nm) through a single slit and viewing the pattern on a screen 1.58 m behind the slit.

What is the slit width?

28-38.gif


Homework Equations



a = {(wavelength)D}/(distance of minima)

The Attempt at a Solution



a = {(632.8 x 10^-9)(1.58)}/(.152)

Answer: slit width = 6.577 x 10^-6 which is very wrong.

I feel like my equation is definitely wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Last edited by a moderator:
So by dividing by .076 instead of .152 I get 1.316 x 10^-5 which is incorrect. I must be misunderstanding you, sorry.
 
Octoshark said:
So by dividing by .076 instead of .152 I get 1.316 x 10^-5 which is incorrect.
0.076 would be the distance from the center to which minima?
 
Ahhh, got it. Thanks a bunch ;)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top