Calculating Stress Values for Cylindrical Steel Sample

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating stress values for a cylindrical steel sample tested in tension, with a cross-sectional area of 500 mm2. The yield stress is calculated as 410 MPa, the ultimate tensile stress as 516 MPa, and the fracture stress as 670 MPa, considering a 40% reduction in area at fracture. Participants clarify that stress values should be reported in MPa rather than Nm-2 and discuss the distinction between engineering stress and true stress in reporting fracture stress.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of tensile testing and stress calculations
  • Familiarity with units of measurement in material science, specifically MPa
  • Knowledge of engineering stress versus true stress concepts
  • Basic principles of material properties, including yield strength and ultimate tensile strength
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the differences between engineering stress and true stress in material testing
  • Learn about the significance of reduction of area in tensile testing
  • Explore the calculation methods for yield strength and ultimate tensile strength
  • Investigate the implications of reporting stress values in different units
USEFUL FOR

Material scientists, mechanical engineers, and students studying material properties and tensile testing methodologies will benefit from this discussion.

Dave_
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I have a cylindrical steel sample tested in tension. It's cross-sectional area is 500 mm2. I am also told that:


  • Force at yield = 205 kN
    Maximum force = 258 kN
    Force at fracture = 200 kN
I am asked to calculate the yield stress, ultimate tensile stress and fracture stress if the reduction of area at fracture is 40%.

Working:

Yield Stress:

Yield Stress = 205 x103 / 5 x10-4 = 4.1 x108 Nm-2

Ultimate Tensile Strength

Ultimate Tensile Stress = 258 x103 / 5 x10-4 = 5.16 x108 Nm-2

Fracture Stress

For this question I reduced the 5 x10-4 by 40% to get 3 x10-4. I then did 200 x 103 / 3 x10-4 = 6.7 x108 Nm-2.

Are my answers correct? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The method looks OK.

Stress values are usually given in MPa, not Nm-2.
 
AlephZero said:
The method looks OK.

Stress values are usually given in MPa, not Nm-2.
Hi AlephZero,

Isn't fracture stress usually reported based on the original cross section (so called engineering stress), rather than the actual cross section (so-called true stress)? That would be consistent with how yield stress and ultimate stress were calculated by the OP. What is your experience in this regard?

Chet
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
11K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
3K