Calculating Take-Off Velocity for High Jumper Kwaku Boateng

  • Thread starter Thread starter x2017
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    velocity
AI Thread Summary
To calculate Kwaku Boateng's take-off velocity, the average vertical ground reaction force of 1959.6 N and his mass of 79.1 kg were used in the equation ΣFΔt=mΔv. Initial attempts yielded an incorrect take-off velocity of 4.95 m/s. The correct approach included accounting for gravitational force, leading to the revised calculation of Δv as 2.99 m/s. This adjustment confirmed that the take-off velocity is indeed 2.99 m/s, resolving the initial confusion. The discussion highlights the importance of incorporating gravitational force in such calculations.
x2017
Messages
84
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Kwaku Boateng is a former Canadian Olympic high jumper. If an average vertical ground reaction force of 1959.6 N acted on Kwaku's foot for 0.20 s during the upward phase of his jump, and Boateng's mass is 79.1 kg, what would his take-off velocity be?

Homework Equations


ΣFΔt=mΔv

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried it twice...

Attempt 1:
ΣFΔt=mΔv
Δv=(ΣFΔt)/m
Δv=(1959.6)(0.20)/79.1
Δv=4.95m/s

The online assignment says that this answer is incorrect.

Attempt 2:
ΣFΔt=mΔv
Vf-Vi=(ΣFΔt)/m
Vi=-[(ΣFΔt)/m]+Vf
Vi=(1959.6)(0.20)/79.1
Vi=-4.95m/s

The online assignment says that this answer is incorrect.

Should I be using another equation? Or have I made a simple mistake?

Thank you in advance for your help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you need to include the force of gravity?
 
RUber said:
Do you need to include the force of gravity?

Ahhhhh, yes that's it!

ΣFΔt=mΔv
Δv=(ΣFΔt)/m
Δv=[1959.6-(79.1)(9.81)](0.20)/79.1
Δv=2.99m/s

The computer is telling me 2.99m/s is the correct answer, thank you for your help RUber!
 
  • Like
Likes RUber
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top