Calculating the Electric field for a ring

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding why a charged ring can be replaced with two oppositely charged disks using the superposition principle. This simplification is valid as it allows for easier calculations of the electric field. The resulting charge distribution can be visualized as an annulus, where the total charge remains consistent. Participants note that while a double integral can be used for calculations, symmetry allows for a more straightforward single integral approach. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the utility of superposition in simplifying complex charge distributions.
link223
Messages
70
Reaction score
12
Homework Statement
(II) A flat ring (inner radius R outer radius 4R ) is
uniformly charged. In terms of the total charge Q, determine the electric field on the axis at points (a) 0.25R and (b) 0.75R from the center of the ring. [Hint: The ring can be
replaced with two oppositely charged superposed disks.]
Relevant Equations
Gauss' Law
What i don't understand is why we are able to replace the ring with 'two oppositely charged superposed disks'?

Just trying to understand..
So we have a uniform charge which means that this'll just be a simplification of the problem than, correct?

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
By the superposition principle, the solution to the sum of two charge distributions is the sum of the solutions to the separate charge distributions. If you take a small disk and a large disk with the opposite surface charge density (not charge!) then the sum of the charge distributions is an annulus as described in the problem as the resulting charge distribution within R is zero and between R and 4R there will only be the larger disc. Make sure to normalise your charge distribution such that the total charge distribution is of total charge Q.
 
To me, the hint makes sense if the on-axis electric field due to a uniformly disk is assumed as given and there is no requirement to derive it. If there is such a requirement, I think doing the double integral would be simpler.
 
kuruman said:
I think doing the double integral would be simpler.
Well, the double integral is also relatively easily written as a single integral just by symmetry arguments, making that approach even simpler. However, the difference in complexity is inserting zero twice in the primitive function (which evaluates to zero if you use the most convenient choice of integration constant).
 
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'
Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up ##Mg \sin \theta ## will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards ## \mu Mg \cos \theta ## Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...
TL;DR Summary: Find Electric field due to charges between 2 parallel infinite planes using Gauss law at any point Here's the diagram. We have a uniform p (rho) density of charges between 2 infinite planes in the cartesian coordinates system. I used a cube of thickness a that spans from z=-a/2 to z=a/2 as a Gaussian surface, each side of the cube has area A. I know that the field depends only on z since there is translational invariance in x and y directions because the planes are...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Back
Top