Calculating the moment of inertia for this configuration

Demon117
Messages
162
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


I need to find the rotational kinetic energy of this system in the figure I have provided. Here the spring is rotating with the system at angular speed \omega. The two beads on the wire move vertically, and the third bead is held by two massless rods of equal length L.


The Attempt at a Solution


Would the moment of inertia for the the whole thing just be

I_{1,3}=2mL^{2}

I_{2,3}=2mL^{2}

I_{total}=4mL^{2}

Any suggestions would be helpful.
 

Attachments

  • Rotating spring beads.jpg
    Rotating spring beads.jpg
    6.2 KB · Views: 533
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Demon117 said:

Homework Statement


I need to find the rotational kinetic energy of this system in the figure I have provided. Here the spring is rotating with the system at angular speed \omega. The two beads on the wire move vertically, and the third bead is held by two massless rods of equal length L.


The Attempt at a Solution


Would the moment of inertia for the the whole thing just be

I_{1,3}=2mL^{2}

I_{2,3}=2mL^{2}

I_{total}=4mL^{2}

Any suggestions would be helpful.
attachment.php?attachmentid=44946&d=1331411191.jpg


It looks as though the system is constrained to rotate about the z-axis.

You need to find the moment of inertia about the z-axis.
 
Will it depend on the angle \alpha?
 
Demon117 said:
Will it depend on the angle \alpha?

Yes it will depend on α .
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top