Calculating the ratio between heat capacities of a gas

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the ratio of specific heats (gamma) for a gas using pressure and volume data. The user initially struggles with understanding the derivation of specific heat values for monatomic and diatomic gases but learns that gamma can be derived from the relationship between Cp and Cv, where Cp = Cv + R. They discover that the gas undergoes adiabatic expansion, allowing them to apply the formula PV^gamma = K to find gamma. The user attempts calculations assuming the gas is monatomic but questions the validity of canceling variables in their equations, expressing concern about determining the gas type later in the task. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding thermodynamic principles in calculating specific heat ratios.
DoubleHelix
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Hi, my task is to calculate the ratio (gamma) between the specific heats of a gas (Cp and Cv). The only information I have is a table of data for the pressures and volumes of the gas at different temperatures. I don't know if its monatomic, diatomic etc. (it's a later task to determine this).

My attempt so far. I've been researching this for hours and I've discovered that the ratio I need to find is gamma = Cp / Cv. I've learned that Cp = Cv + R where R is the gas constant and that Cv = 3R/2 for a monatomic gas, 5R/2 for a diatomic gas and that Cp = 5R/2 for a monatomic gas, 7R/2 for a diatomic gas but have been unable to find where these numbers come from! I also found a useful formula that
gamma = 1 + (R/Cv) so I only really need to find either Cv or Cp using my data to solve this question.

Thanks for any help.
 
Science news on Phys.org
What kind of transformation is the gas doing?

If it is diabatic, then you can find \gamma from PV^{\gamma}=K, and then compare that value with the theoretical values of \frac{C_p}{C_v} and find out what kind of molecule the gas is made of.

Here's an example for a monoatomic gas: It has 3 translational degrees of freedom, no rotation and no vibration, so N=3, and by the energy equipartition theorem you have a total energy of
U=n(3+0+0)\frac{1}{2}RT
where n is the mole number.

In order to calculate C_v you can prove that
C_v=\frac{1}{n}(\frac{dU}{dT})_{v=const}
and because
C_p=C_v+R you know the theoretical \gamma.
 
  • Like
Likes gracy
After reading your reply I read through the question again and noticed that it mentions the the gas is undergoing adiabatic expansion in a later part of the question, I never read this far into the question before so I didn't realize. Would the relation you mentioned hold true for an adiabatic expansion? I'm going to do more research with this new found information!

Thanks a lot!
 
It holds for any adiabatic process,in other words, any process in which there is no heat exchange between the system and the surrounding universe.
 
Gunthi said:
What kind of transformation is the gas doing?

If it is diabatic, then you can find \gamma from PV^{\gamma}=K, and then compare that value with the theoretical values of \frac{C_p}{C_v} and find out what kind of molecule the gas is made of.

Here's an example for a monoatomic gas: It has 3 translational degrees of freedom, no rotation and no vibration, so N=3, and by the energy equipartition theorem you have a total energy of
U=n(3+0+0)\frac{1}{2}RT
where n is the mole number.

In order to calculate C_v you can prove that
C_v=\frac{1}{n}(\frac{dU}{dT})_{v=const}
and because
C_p=C_v+R you know the theoretical \gamma.

OK so I had a go at using the method you told me and, I did:
\frac{C_p}{C_v} = \frac{C_v + R}{C_v}
= \frac{\frac{1}{n}(\frac{dU}{dT}) + R}{\frac{1}{n}(\frac{dU}{dT})}

And assumed (for now) that it is a monatomic gas to calculate a set of U values which I plotted against the T values and drew a trendline through these points to get the gradient. Now, I (wrongly) canceled the top and bottom n to get

\frac{C_p}{C_v} = \frac{(\frac{dU}{dT}) + R}{(\frac{dU}{dT})}

and substituted the values into get 1.66 which relates to H or He. However, as I stated I wrongly canceled the ns I think, or am I allowed the cancel the ns? This means n must equal 1 BUT it's a later part of the question to calculate n which is why I'm panicing a little! Also I assumed monatomic gas, is there no way to do this for a general case because it's also a later part of the question to determine if its monatomic/diatomic etc. lol. I have all the answers but in the wrong order!
Thanks a lot anyway, you've been a great help. Do you have any other ideas?
 
Back
Top