Calculating Torque and Work on an Electric Dipole in a Uniform Electric Field

  • Thread starter Thread starter tropskaerf
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dipole Torque
AI Thread Summary
An electric dipole consisting of two opposite charges of 2 µC, separated by 10 cm, is placed in a uniform electric field of 10 N/C at a 45-degree angle. The torque on the dipole can be calculated using the formula T = p × E, where p is the dipole moment (p = QL). The work required to move the dipole from 45 degrees to 180 degrees can be determined using the equation W = pE(cos(theta1) - cos(theta2)). The discussion highlights the importance of understanding the orientation of the dipole and the role of angles in torque and work calculations. The user ultimately resolved their confusion and sought clarification on their solution process.
tropskaerf
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
An electric dipole in the x-y plane consists of two opposite charges with magnitudes of 2uC placed 10cm apart. The dipole is placed in an electric field of 10 N/C along the x-axis with a direction of p +45 degrees from the x axis.
1)Determine the magnitude and direction of torque on the dipole
2)How much work will you have to do to move the dipole from 45 degrees to 180 degrees.

So far i know that T= p X E which equals pEsin(theta) and I know that p = QL. Would the charge Q be equal to 2uC as described in the problem? I also don't understand why the dipole would rotate from 45 degrees to 180 degrees rather than down to 0 degrees when both of these directions would follow the electric field is this because of the orientation of the positive and negative charges?

I feel like simply plugging into pEsin(theta) to get QLEsin(theta) = 2uC*10cm*10N/C*sin(45) would be too simple to calculate the torque.

I know that work is the integration of torque between the two angles and that doing so would get me W= pE(cos(theta1)-cos(theta2)) i also feel like plugging in here to get W = -QLE(cos(theta2)-cos(theta1))= -2uC*10cm*10N/C*(cos(180)-cos(45)) would be too simple and not correct.

also, i know that many of these variables are vectors but i don't know how to display the arrows above them on here.

any help would be much appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nevermind i figured it out
 
Can you tell us how you figured it out?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top