Calculating Torque in a Hanging Rod System

  • Thread starter Thread starter Joosh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rod Torque
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating torque in a hanging rod system, particularly in preparation for a physics exam. The key equation for torque is τ = rA × Fnet, and it's noted that for a system at rest, the net torque must equal zero. The participant initially struggles with the problem but realizes that the center of mass is crucial for determining the gravitational force acting on the rod. They confirm that the torques involved include gravity and the applied force, leading to a balance for a zero net torque. Understanding the role of the center of mass is essential for solving the torque-related question.
Joosh
Messages
7
Reaction score
4
Hey, folks! So upon studying for my Physics final tomorrow, I came across this question on the practice exam, which I know the answer is D from the solution key. However, I'm not sure how to get that for the answer.

1. Homework Statement
iNmDGIX.jpg


Homework Equations


τ = rA × Fnet
LA = Ltrans, A + Lrot
Ltrans = rcm × Ptot
Lrot = r1 × p1 + r2 × p2 + ...

The Attempt at a Solution


I personally don't entirely know where to start. I'm going to guess this is a torque-related question, but I'm not sure if that's the right way to go at it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The rod is at rest when the force F is applied. What can you say about what the sum of the torques about the hinge must be for bodies at rest? No need to get involved with momentum
 
The net torque would equal zero.
 
Joosh said:
The net torque would equal zero.
So what are the torques? What equation do you get for a zero sum?
 
Would it just be gravity and the force pushing the rod upwards?
 
I asked one of the graduate teaching assistants about this and he was able to help me figure this out. I simply forgot that the center of mass is where gravity is pulling down on the rod.
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

How Does Torque Apply to a Rotating Rod on a Frictionless Surface?
Replies
4
Views
2K
Calculating Net Torque in a Rotating System
Replies
22
Views
3K
Finding torque by integration of weight
Replies
12
Views
2K
Torque and Equilibrium of a Rod
Replies
1
Views
3K
Rotating rod of negligible mass attached to two point masses
Replies
19
Views
4K
Torque and rotation around a fixed point
Replies
18
Views
5K
What is the Maximum Distance for the Load on the Rod?
Replies
11
Views
4K
Calculate the magnitude and direction of the torque
Replies
1
Views
2K
Trouble understanding the answer to this torque question
Replies
3
Views
2K
How Do You Calculate Torques for a Ladder in Static Equilibrium?
Replies
2
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top