Calculating Torque of sphere resting on an inclined plane

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the torque on a sphere resting on an inclined plane, one must consider the gravitational force component acting down the incline, which is mg*sin(θ). The frictional force, which acts at a distance from the center of mass, generates torque, calculated using τ = r × F, where r is the distance from the center of mass to the point of friction application. It's essential to differentiate between rolling and slipping; the friction force formula applies only during slipping, while rolling without slipping requires a different approach to determine the relationship between mass, angle, and acceleration. For total acceleration, two dynamic equations must be established: one for translational motion and another for rotational motion. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurately analyzing the motion of the sphere on the incline.
candyshot
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
If I have a sphere with mass m and radius r, resting on an inclined plane with angle \theta. What is the torque on the sphere due to gravity pull?

I know that the force that pulls the sphere down the plane is mg *\sin \theta and the (static) frictional force is -\mu_s * mg \cos \theta.

If we can assume the sphere does not slip, how does one calculate the torque that the frictional force exerts on the sphere?

Im also interested in how to calculcate the total acceleration of the sphere.

/CandyShot
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If you draw a neatly labeled freebody diagram, you will see that the force component of weight along the incline (downhill) is mg\sin\theta. Now, this force acts through the mass center so it has a zero torque contribution about the CM. On the other hand (assuming of course that the incline doesn't translate) the friction force equal to f does not act through the mass center so it has a torque about the mass center which tends to increase the rotational velocity of the body (draw arrows to convince yourself that this is true).

For a formal solution, consider (i',j',k') unit vectors along the incline, perpendicular to it (k' = i' X j'). Resolve the forces and the vector \vec{r} from the CM to the point of application of friction force and compute the torque due to this force by using \tau = \vec{r}X\vec{F}.

For the total acceleration you need to write 2 dynamic equations: one for translation of the center of mass (as you would write for a block sliding down an incline) and one for rotation.

Now it is important to make a distinction between rolling and slipping. The formula for friction force you have used can be applied only when slipping is given to occur. If rolling without slipping occurs then the the velocity of the point of contact of the body is zero. In this case you cannot use f = \mu mg\cos\theta and must not substitute any value of f. f will enter the dynamic equation for rotation and also the translational equation. Eliminate f to get the relationship between the mass, theta and acceleration.
 
Last edited:
Okey, thanks for that.

/Candyshot
 
candyshot said:
Okey, thanks for that.

/Candyshot

I discovered a major mistake in my post and have edited it. Please read the post all over again. Sorry for the inconvenience.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top