Calculating trace with slashed item

  • Thread starter Thread starter qaok
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Trace
qaok
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I was asked to find Tr [STRIKE]q[/STRIKE] ([STRIKE]p[/STRIKE] + m) [STRIKE]q[/STRIKE] ([STRIKE]p[/STRIKE] + m)

Homework Equations



Tr [STRIKE]p[/STRIKE] [STRIKE]q[/STRIKE] = 4pq

The Attempt at a Solution



If I expand it as Tr ([STRIKE]p[/STRIKE] [STRIKE]q[/STRIKE] [STRIKE]p[/STRIKE] [STRIKE]q[/STRIKE] + m [STRIKE]q[/STRIKE] [STRIKE]p[/STRIKE] [STRIKE]q[/STRIKE] + m [STRIKE]q[/STRIKE] [STRIKE]q[/STRIKE] [STRIKE]p[/STRIKE] + (m^2)([STRIKE]q[/STRIKE])^2 ), although Tr Π(odd number of gamma matrices) = 0, since [STRIKE]q[/STRIKE] [STRIKE]p[/STRIKE] [STRIKE]q[/STRIKE] and similar terms are not square matrices, trace has no meaning. If I treat ([STRIKE]p[/STRIKE] + m) as a covariant vector (adding m to each component of [STRIKE]p[/STRIKE], I can get a scalar*I, but a lot of [STRIKE]q[/STRIKE]_0,1,2,3 [STRIKE]p[/STRIKE]_0,1,2,3 terms will come out and get really messy. Can anyone help me please? Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I thought [STRIKE]p[/STRIKE] was a vector, but now I realize that it is not. So the trace makes sense.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top