Calculating Velocity After a Force is Applied

  • Thread starter Thread starter cheerspens
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy
AI Thread Summary
Jennifer applies a force of 2.0 N to a 100.0 kg wagon initially moving at 0.50 m/s over a distance of 5.0 m, neglecting friction. For part a, the calculated ending velocity after the push in the direction of motion is 0.67 m/s, with the work done being 10 J. In part b, when the push opposes the motion, the ending velocity is 0.23 m/s, with the ending kinetic energy being 2.55 J. It is advised to avoid the term "internal energy" and instead refer to work-energy methods when discussing the work done by non-conservative forces. Accurate terminology is essential for clarity in physics discussions.
cheerspens
Messages
92
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Jennifer applies a force of 2.0 N upon a 100.0 kg wagon, which was initially moving at 0.50 m/s. This force acts over a distance of 5.0 m. Assume friction can be neglected.
a) What is the wagon's velocity after Jennifer's push if she pushes the wagon in the direction of motion?
b) What is the wagon's velocity after Jennifer's push if her push opposes the wagon's motion?


Homework Equations


KE=.5v2
lw-l=F\DeltaXcos\theta
w+=F\DeltaXcos\theta

The Attempt at a Solution


a) I got an initial KE of 12.5 J and an initial IE of 10 J. My ending KE was 22.55 J. My answer was a velocity of 0.67 m/s. Is this correct?

b) I got and initial KE of 12.5 J then my ending IE was -10 J and ending KE 2.55 J. My answer for the velocity was 0.23 m/s. Is this correct?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As in your other post, you are getting correct answers, but refrain from using the term 'internal energy' when work done by non conservative forces are involved. Instead , use work energy methods...in part a, for example, the work done by the applied force is 10J, don't call it internal energy. What equation are you using when you refer to 'internal energy'?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top