Calculating Vertical Velocity: Derivatives and Rates of a Waterskier on a Ramp

  • Thread starter Thread starter SyntheticVisions
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivatives
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the vertical velocity of a waterskier leaving a ramp at a speed of 30 ft/s. The skier's speed can be interpreted as either along the x-axis or the hypotenuse, leading to confusion in deriving the vertical component of velocity. Using the Pythagorean theorem, the relationship between the horizontal and vertical components is established, but the calculations yield inconsistent results. A vectorial approach is suggested for a more straightforward solution, emphasizing the need to clarify the chosen reference axis. Ultimately, understanding the skier's motion in terms of vectors simplifies the problem and provides a clearer path to the correct vertical velocity.
SyntheticVisions
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I'm having some trouble with a few problems involving derivatives and rates. Here's one of the ones that is confusing me:

A waterskier skis over the ramp shown in the figure at a speed of 30ft/s. How fast is she rising as she leaves the ramp?

The ramp is a right triangle facing the waterskier so that they can go up it, with sides of (assume y is the vertical axis, x is horizontal, z is hypotenuse) x = 15ft, y = 4ft, and by the pythagorean theorem, z = \sqrt{241}

The first problem I was having here, is whether or not the speed given is relative to the x axis, or the z axis? I would think generally the x axis, but the problem states "over the ramp". Also, when doing the problem for the speed given on the x-axis I got a negative number for dy/dt. When doing it given on the z axis I get about 116ft/s, which seems too fast.

Assuming it's on the x I set it up like so (I wasn't sure if I should use z^2, but I don't know what dz/dt is so I didn't...):

x^2 + y^2 = \sqrt{241}

2x \frac{dx}{dt} + 2y \frac{dy}{dt} = 0

900 + 8 \frac{dy}{dt} = 0

\frac{dy}{dt} = \frac{-225}{2}

Which doesn't make any sense. Where am I going wrong here?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Assume that the boat pulling the skier is traveling at 30 ft/sec as the skier starts up the ramp and the boat is traveling a constant 30 ft/sec. Then the skier's speed must be higher in the along the hypotenuse to compensate for the longer distance.

However, consider v_x = 30 ft/sec. Then the skier travels the length of the ramp (15 ft) in 15/30 = 0.5 sec.

In the same amount of time, the skier has risen the height.

Now figure out the vertical speed.
 
Makes sense, thanks.
 
By the way, if you approach this problem in a vectorial way, the solution is much more elegant than using derivatives and rates.

Just assume either the 30m/s velocity vector to be either along the hypothenuse or the x-axis, depending on your interpretation of the question (make sure to clearly mention the option you choose, as this will show your scientific approach).
Just split it then according to the other direction and a vertical component in the right way. The speed of the vertical component is then your vertical velocity component.

Regards,
Leo
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top