Calculating Voltage Change in a Voltage Divider Circuit

JinFTW
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider the following voltage divider circuit with these values: R1= 10.0 kΩ, R3= 15.0 kΩ, E1= 13.0 V. What is the percent change in Vx when we connect a load resistor Rx = 10 R3?

http://a.imageshack.us/img25/1546/circuity.th.png

Homework Equations



V1 = E * R3 / (R1 + R3)

R3x = 1/R3 + 1/Rx = 1/REq

V2 = E * R3x / (R3x + R1)

Use division with the voltage solutions to find the percentage change.

The Attempt at a Solution



I went ahead and found V1, which in this case was 7.8V

Then I found R3x, which was 13.6 kohms

After using R3x with the V2 equation it appears the percentage change is wrong. So I have to assume that 10*R3 isn't a simple multiplication of the resistance value, and that sounds right, except for the fact that I haven't taken a physics course for years and can't remember what you do differently when you multiply a resistance value.

Okay, I apologize I should have posted my results first:
V1: 13*0.6 = 7.8
R3x = 13.64

V2: 13*0.58 = 7.5

Percentage Change = 3.8 % (which is wrong)


I'm not sure why its wrong exactly, but any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
For the most part, it looks okay. V1 and V2 equations are right. The R3x equation is partly wrong but the value looks okay. Double check your numbers, and if you are still having trouble I can take another look.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top