Calculating Voltage in Magnetopause: EMF & Magnetic Flux

kd001
Messages
42
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Use the law of electromagnetic induction to deduce what typical voltage would be imposed in the magnetopause by the interplanetary magnetic field, assuming a scale size of the magnetopause of 10Re?



Homework Equations



-Magnetic flux equation
-Faraday's law


The Attempt at a Solution



See attachment for solution.

I took the interplanetary magnetic field strength to be 10^-9T (is this right?) and assumed that the magnetopause rotates at the same rate as the Earth.

Did I get it right? I normally do this sort of calculation for conductors rotating in a magnetic field. In this case one magnetic field is imposing an emf on another magnetic field. Did I have to take into account the strength of the magnetopause?

Thanks a lot for any advice.
 

Attachments

  • solution.jpg
    solution.jpg
    11.4 KB · Views: 450
Physics news on Phys.org
Nothing? I just want to know if my solution makes sense to anyone.

Thanks

EDIT: I just realized, I made a mistake in the area calculation. I should have calculated the surface area of a sphere. But apart from that is the method correct?
 
Last edited:
Hi
It looks right with the area change.
I have to do the exact same question for my lab project.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top