Calculating Volume of a Region: Integration in Polar Coordinates

  • Thread starter Thread starter Calpalned
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Volume
Calpalned
Messages
297
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement


xxx.png


2. Homework Equations

n/a

The Attempt at a Solution


qqq.png

[/B]1) Whenever I need to find the volume between two surfaces, the integrand is simply the difference (subtraction) of the two equations? In the solution guide above, it is clear that they subtracted the two equations for z.

2) After transforming the double integral into polar coordinates, how did the solutions guide figure out the limits of integration? The object being integrated is a paraboloid limited by z = 4. Why then do the limits go from 0 to 2pi? Where do the limits for R (the inner integral) come from?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1) Whenever I need to find the volume between two surfaces, the integrand is simply the difference (subtraction) of the two equations? In the solution guide above, it is clear that they subtracted the two equations for z.
You shouldn't have to ask! You can take a small "delta x- delta y" rectangle in the xy-plane and then the height of the rectangular solid is the z distance between the bottom and the top- that is, the difference between "the two equations". The volume is z delta x delta y which, in the limit becomes the integral of the z difference dx dy.

2) After transforming the double integral into polar coordinates, how did the solutions guide figure out the limits of integration? The object being integrated is a paraboloid limited by z = 4. Why then do the limits go from 0 to 2pi? Where do the limits for R (the inner integral) come from?
In your uv- coordinates the two bounding surfaces are z= 4 and z= u^2+ v^2. They intersect at u^2+ v^2= 4. You should be able to recognize that as a circle in the uv- plane with center at (0, 0) and radius 2. To cover that circle, take r from 0 to 2 and \theta from 0 to 2\pi.
 
  • Like
Likes SammyS
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top