Calculating Volume of Rotation w/ Shell Method: Integral Difference

  • Thread starter Thread starter alingy1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rotation Volume
alingy1
Messages
325
Reaction score
0
calculate the volume obtained when the area bounded by y=e^x, x=1, y=1, is rotated around x=4. use shell method. Can I see your integral?

My teacher gave me the first integral. I found the second one here: BUT: the two do not give the same numerical result:
integral of pi((4-lnx)^2-9) FROM 1 to e =/= integral of 2pi(4-x)(e^x-1) dx from 0 to 1
 
Physics news on Phys.org
alingy1 said:
calculate the volume obtained when the area bounded by y=e^x, x=1, y=1, is rotated around x=4. use shell method. Can I see your integral?

My teacher gave me the first integral. I found the second one here: BUT: the two do not give the same numerical result:
integral of pi((4-lnx)^2-9) FROM 1 to e =/= integral of 2pi(4-x)(e^x-1) dx from 0 to 1

This integral -- "integral of pi((4-lnx)^2-9) FROM 1 to e" -- is using disks (washers, actually), but the term you show as lnx should be ln(y). In a more nicely formated form, this integral is
$$ \pi \int_{y = 1}^e [(4 - ln(y))^2 - 9]dy$$
Since both integrals represent the volume of the same geometric object, they have to give the same result. Since you're not getting the same result, you must be doing something wrong. Please show us your work for the integral above.
 
Both integrals evaluate to roughly 14.91. Where do you get a different value?
 
That mean you shouldn't use Wolfram for this problem! At least not until you are sure you can use it properly. As you say, Wolfram is interpreting \pi(x) as a function "pi of x", which returns the number of primes less than or equal to x (or the largest integer less than or equal to x if x is not itself an integer) not as the number \pi times x.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top