Calculating Wave Function for Standing Wave on String

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the wave function for a standing wave on a string with fixed ends. The parameters provided include an amplitude of 2.46 mm, a period of 3.65 ms, and a wave speed of 111 m/s. The resulting wave function is expressed as y(x,t)=(A_sw)(sinkx)(sinwt), with A_sw calculated as 4.92 x 10^-3 m, k as 15.5/m, and angular frequency w as 1720 rad/s. The user encounters issues with the phase component, indicating that without specific wave functions, the phase cannot be determined.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of wave mechanics and standing waves
  • Familiarity with wave parameters: amplitude, period, and speed
  • Knowledge of trigonometric functions in wave equations
  • Experience with angular frequency and wave number calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of wave functions for standing waves
  • Learn about the role of phase in wave interference
  • Explore the concept of wave superposition in physics
  • Investigate the use of simulation tools like PhET for visualizing wave behavior
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those studying wave mechanics, as well as anyone interested in understanding the mathematical representation of standing waves on strings.

Scarborm
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hey!
Here is one that I thought would be easy:

Two traveling waves move on a string that has a fixed end at x=0. They are identical except for opposite velocities. Each has an amplitude of 2.46mm, a period of 3.65ms, and a speed of 111m/s. Write the wave function of the resulting standing wave.

The wave would be represented by the function, y(x,t)=(A_sw)(sinkx)(sinwt)

My answers were: A_sw=2A=4.92x10^-3m
k=w/v=1720/111=15.5/m
w=2*pi/T=2*pi/(3.65x10^-3)=1720rad/s

This is not right though... any ideas? I am least sure about k.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What makes you think it isn't right?

If you're not given the actual wave functions,
you can't find the phase in sin(wt+phi)
(so you should leave it as arbitrary).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K