Calculating work done by a bicycle

AI Thread Summary
Calculating the work done by a bicycle involves understanding the relationship between torque, force, and moment of inertia, particularly focusing on the bicycle's wheels. While the kinetic energy formula is mentioned, it is clarified that torque and power are more relevant, primarily influenced by wind and rolling resistance. The discussion highlights that the effort felt while running compared to cycling is largely due to biological factors, as cycling mechanics are more efficient. Additionally, running involves vertical movement, which adds to the energy expenditure. Overall, the complexities of calculating work in cycling versus running are acknowledged, emphasizing the need to consider various physical factors.
Xyius
Messages
501
Reaction score
4
I run a lot and recently started cycling. I want to calculate the work done by a bicycle and compare it to the work done by running. My problem is I am having trouble calculating the work done by a bicycle. Would it simply be a matter of calculating it using the formula..

\frac{1}{2}I\omega^2

And I would need to calculate the moment of inertia off the bicycle wheel with the center turning radius taken into account, since that is the only part of the bicycle the user moves by peddling.

Does anyone agree with this analysis? What are your opinions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To calculate the torque I need the moment of inertia. If I write the torque as T=Fr, then what would be F?

Here is something interesting.
W=\tau \theta = Fr\frac{x}{r} = Fx
This is the formula for translational work. So would that suggest that it takes the same work to run and bike? That isn't true though because I get way more tired when running. :\

Unless F in the rotational sense has a different value than the translational sense.
 
Last edited:
Xyius said:
To calculate the torque I need the moment of inertia.
No, torque is not dependent on moment of inertia unless the wheels are continuously accelerating.

Torque (and power) is primarily dependent on wind and rolling resistance (unless you are going uphill!).
If I write the torque as T=Fr, then what would be F?
F is the force your feet apply to the pedals or the force the wheels apply to the road, depending on from which you want to calculate the work.
Here is something interesting.
W=\tau \theta = Fr\frac{x}{r} = Fx
This is the formula for translational work. So would that suggest that it takes the same work to run and bike? That isn't true though because I get way more tired when running. :\

Unless F in the rotational sense has a different value than the translational sense.
The reason you get more tired running has much more to do with biology. Bicycle pedals and gears are optimized for you to efficiently apply power to them. In running a huge fraction of the power is lost just in making your legs move.
 
russ_watters said:
No, torque is not dependent on moment of inertia unless the wheels are continuously accelerating.

Torque (and power) is primarily dependent on wind and rolling resistance (unless you are going uphill!).
F is the force your feet apply to the pedals or the force the wheels apply to the road, depending on from which you want to calculate the work.
The reason you get more tired running has much more to do with biology. Bicycle pedals and gears are optimized for you to efficiently apply power to them. In running a huge fraction of the power is lost just in making your legs move.

Also remember when you are running you are also going up and down and it is the lift that needs also to be concidered
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top