Calculating Stress Values for Cylindrical Steel Sample

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating stress values for a cylindrical steel sample tested in tension, with specific forces provided for yield, maximum, and fracture points. The calculated yield stress is 410 MPa, ultimate tensile strength is 516 MPa, and fracture stress is 670 MPa, with the latter adjusted for a 40% reduction in area. There is a clarification that stress values are typically expressed in MPa rather than Nm-2. Additionally, a point is raised regarding whether fracture stress should be calculated based on the original or actual cross-section, aligning with standard practices for yield and ultimate stress calculations. The conversation emphasizes the importance of consistent measurement methods in stress calculations.
Dave_
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I have a cylindrical steel sample tested in tension. It's cross-sectional area is 500 mm2. I am also told that:


  • Force at yield = 205 kN
    Maximum force = 258 kN
    Force at fracture = 200 kN
I am asked to calculate the yield stress, ultimate tensile stress and fracture stress if the reduction of area at fracture is 40%.

Working:

Yield Stress:

Yield Stress = 205 x103 / 5 x10-4 = 4.1 x108 Nm-2

Ultimate Tensile Strength

Ultimate Tensile Stress = 258 x103 / 5 x10-4 = 5.16 x108 Nm-2

Fracture Stress

For this question I reduced the 5 x10-4 by 40% to get 3 x10-4. I then did 200 x 103 / 3 x10-4 = 6.7 x108 Nm-2.

Are my answers correct? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The method looks OK.

Stress values are usually given in MPa, not Nm-2.
 
AlephZero said:
The method looks OK.

Stress values are usually given in MPa, not Nm-2.
Hi AlephZero,

Isn't fracture stress usually reported based on the original cross section (so called engineering stress), rather than the actual cross section (so-called true stress)? That would be consistent with how yield stress and ultimate stress were calculated by the OP. What is your experience in this regard?

Chet
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top