Calculation of g force on an bank of an aeroplane

  • Thread starter Thread starter intreates
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculation Force
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the G force on an airplane turning uniformly, the formula f=mv^2/r is used, where mass is 79,015 kg, velocity is 257.2 m/s, and radius is 100 meters, resulting in a force of approximately 52,269,876.376 N. This force leads to an acceleration of 661.51 m/s², which translates to a G force of 67.5 Gs when divided by 9.8 m/s². However, this calculation only considers the horizontal component of the loading factor, and the vertical G force due to gravity must also be factored in for a complete analysis. Ultimately, such a tight turn at high speed would exceed the structural limits of the aircraft, making it impossible for the plane to perform safely. This illustrates why airplanes cannot execute such maneuvers at high velocities.
intreates
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
can anyone tell me how to calculate G force of an airplane of mass=79015, velocity=257.2 m/s turning uniformly at a radius of 100 meters.
I use the formula as f=mv^2/r
i don't know if its correct but i get an answer of f=52269876.376
then i substituted in the equation f=ma .. and i got a= 661.51 m/sec^2
finally i used G=a/g. i got G= 661.51/9.8
and i got 67.5 g's... please help me with this problem .
 
Physics news on Phys.org
And now you know why airplanes do not make such turns when traveling at such high speeds.

Technically, you've only computed the horizontal component of the loading factor. If you had a smaller load, you'd have to combine it with vertical 1g due to gravity. But in this case, it won't make any difference.
 
It's simple: a plane traveling at 257.2 m/s can't turn this tightly without coming apart. Anyone aboard has already blacked out.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
I am attempting to use a Raman TruScan with a 785 nm laser to read a material for identification purposes. The material causes too much fluorescence and doesn’t not produce a good signal. However another lab is able to produce a good signal consistently using the same Raman model and sample material. What would be the reason for the different results between instruments?

Similar threads

Back
Top